2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12030445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Remote Sensing Technologies Capture the Extreme Precipitation Event and Its Cascading Hydrological Response? A Case Study of Hurricane Harvey Using EF5 Modeling Framework

Abstract: A new generation of precipitation measurement products has emerged, and their performances have gained much attention from the scientific community, such as the Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor system (MRMS) from the National Severe Storm Laboratory (NSSL) and the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPM) from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). This study statistically evaluated the MRMS and GPM products and investigated their cascading hydrological response in August of 2017, when Hurrican… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, NCEP differs from MRMS more in the Houston metropolitan areas, as marked in black circles in Figure 3b. This result is on a par with the investigation of Chen et al (2020) [53] in the Harvey event that MRMS has the highest CC (0.91) value and correspondingly lowest RMSE (5.75 mm/h) among NCEP gauge-only products and IMERG V06A in Hurricane Harvey. IMERG, on the other hand, exhibits better agreements with MRMS in the rainfall core regions than NCEP.…”
Section: Mtc Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For example, NCEP differs from MRMS more in the Houston metropolitan areas, as marked in black circles in Figure 3b. This result is on a par with the investigation of Chen et al (2020) [53] in the Harvey event that MRMS has the highest CC (0.91) value and correspondingly lowest RMSE (5.75 mm/h) among NCEP gauge-only products and IMERG V06A in Hurricane Harvey. IMERG, on the other hand, exhibits better agreements with MRMS in the rainfall core regions than NCEP.…”
Section: Mtc Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Combined with our previous study that underlies the importance of infiltration and initial soil moisture for flood inundation modeling, we highly recommend taking into consideration the initial soil moisture state, as it has not been well-recognized in the hydraulic model community. This can be achieved via three ways: 1) warm up the model for a relatively long period prior to the simulation period (Chen et al, 2020); 2) parameterize the initial soil moisture and calibrate it, similar to the way we treat initial in-channel water depth (Xue et al, 2013); 3) approximate it using observations or other model simulations, like what has been done in the real case study in Section 3.2 (Flamig, Vergara, & Gourley, 2020). The first approach is ideal because it eliminates uncertainties in parameterization (such as equifinality) or error propagation from observations/simulations to models; it is, however, the most computationally expensive approach for hydraulic modeling compared to the other two.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ INSERT FIGURE 1 HERE] During the 500-year Hurricane Harvey event, this region is largely inundated due to record-breaking 1600 mm rainfall over a one-week storm lifespan (Chen et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020). According to the Harris Country flood report, both Greens Bayou and Halls Bayou experienced a 500-year water level downstream and 50-year to 100-year in between upstream.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine Learning (ML) or Deep Learning (DL) due to its powerful capacity to solve highly non-linear problems, is becoming ubiquitous across research fields. Some ML/DL based approaches in satellite precipitation retrievals, like Precipitation Estimates from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Network (PERSIANN) family (Hsu et al 1999;Hong et al;2004;Behrangi et al 2009;Ashouri et al, 2015;Sadeghi et al, 2019) have demonstrated their potentials. Regarding AMSU platform, Surussavadee and Staelin (2009) first collected multiple channels along with information from Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) cloud resolving model to fit into a…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It integrates 180 operational radars, including 146 S-band and 30 C-band radars, creating a seamless 3D radar mosaic across the CONUS and Southern Canada. The rigorous quality control steps have made this product been one of the most accurate Quantitative Precipitation Estimations (QPEs) in the CONUS (Chen et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020) and also made it intensively applied to flash flood monitoring (Gourley et al, 2017). The precipitation flags in the MRMS provides eight distinct features in total: missing, no precipitation, cool stratiform, warm stratiform, snow, overshooting, convective, hail, and warm rain.…”
Section: Mrmsmentioning
confidence: 99%