Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1460096.1460120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can relevance of images be inferred from eye movements?

Abstract: Query formulation and efficient navigation through data to reach relevant results are undoubtedly major challenges for image or video retrieval. Queries of good quality are typically not available and the search process needs to rely on relevance feedback given by the user, which makes the search process iterative. Giving explicit relevance feedback is laborious, not always easy, and may even be impossible in ubiquitous computing scenarios. A central question then is: Is it possible to replace or complement sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eye movements can be treated as an implicit relevance feedback when the user is not consciously aware of their eye movements being tracked. Eye movement as implicit feedback has recently been used in the image retrieval setting [Oyekoya and Stentiford 2007;Klami et al 2008;Pasupa et al 2009]. [Oyekoya and Stentiford 2007;Klami et al 2008] used eye movements to infer a binary judgement of relevance while [Pasupa et al 2009] makes the task more complex and realistic for searchbased task by asking the user to give multiple judgement of relevance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eye movements can be treated as an implicit relevance feedback when the user is not consciously aware of their eye movements being tracked. Eye movement as implicit feedback has recently been used in the image retrieval setting [Oyekoya and Stentiford 2007;Klami et al 2008;Pasupa et al 2009]. [Oyekoya and Stentiford 2007;Klami et al 2008] used eye movements to infer a binary judgement of relevance while [Pasupa et al 2009] makes the task more complex and realistic for searchbased task by asking the user to give multiple judgement of relevance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eye movement as implicit feedback has recently been used in the image retrieval setting [Oyekoya and Stentiford 2007;Klami et al 2008;Pasupa et al 2009]. [Oyekoya and Stentiford 2007;Klami et al 2008] used eye movements to infer a binary judgement of relevance while [Pasupa et al 2009] makes the task more complex and realistic for searchbased task by asking the user to give multiple judgement of relevance. Furthermore, earlier studies of Hardoon et al [2007] and Ajanki et al [2009] explored the problem of where an implicit information retrieval query is inferred from eye movements measured during a reading task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In information retrieval, several approaches use eye-tracking to identify images in a search result as attractive or important and use this information as implicit user feedback to improve the image search, e.g., [6,2,5]. Jaimes et al [3] carried out a preliminary analysis of identifying common gaze trajectories in order to classify images into five, predefined semantic categories.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use two baselines that have been applied to evaluate relevance feedback from gaze information in [6] and [5]. We compare the precision P for image-tag-pair assignments calculated from the baseline "naive" (a) and the baseline "random" (b) with the mere measure meanVisitDuration (c) and the meanVisitDuration measure including region extension and weighting (d).…”
Section: Compare With Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eye movements as implicit feedback has recently been considered in the text retrieval setting [11,4,1]. To the best of our knowledge however, at the time of writing, only [10,8] used eye movements for image retrieval. They only infer a binary judgement of relevance whereas in our experiments, we make the task more complex and realistic for search-based tasks by asking the user to rank a set of images on a screen in order of relevance to a specific topic while the eye movements are recorded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%