Can regime shifts in reproduction be explained by changing climate and food availability?

Abstract

Marine populations often show considerable variation in their productivity, including regime shifts. Of special interest are prolonged shifts to low recruitment and low abundance which occur in many fish populations despite reductions in fishing pressure. One of the possible causes for the lack of recovery has been suggested to be the Allee effect (depensation). Nonetheless, both regime shifts and the Allee effect are empirically emerging patterns but provide no explanation about the underlying mechanisms. Environmental forcing, on the other hand, is known to induce population fluctuations and has also been suggested as one of the primary challenges for recovery. In the present study, we build upon recently developed Bayesian change-point models to explore the contribution of food and climate as external drivers in recruitment regime shifts, while accounting for density-dependent mechanisms (compensation and depensation). Food availability is approximated by the copepod community. Temperature is included as a climatic driver. Three demersal fish populations in the Irish Sea are studied: Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), whiting (Merlangius merlangus) and common sole (Solea solea). We demonstrate that, while spawning stock biomass undoubtedly impacts recruitment, abiotic and biotic drivers can have substantial additional impacts, which can explain regime shifts in recruitment dynamics or low recruitment at low population abundances. Our results stress the importance of environmental forcing to capture variability in fish recruitment.

Recruitment regime shifts and nonstationarity are widespread phenomena in harvestable stocks experiencing pronounced climate fluctuations

“…The definition of “regime shift” seems to be generally accepted as “a dramatic and abrupt change that remains persistent over time” (Conversi et al., 2015); however, this normally refers to complex ecosystem processes and often specifically considered as an ecosystem regime shift (Levin & Möllmann, 2015). As demonstrated by our study and others (Perretti et al., 2017; Tirronen et al., 2023), the dynamics of year‐class strength often showed characteristic patterns over varying periodicity, leading us to select the term recruitment regime shifts. However, the AMO, NAO and AO series are basically cyclic (modal) in fashion, whereas the T and GSP series often exhibited several, successive, stepwise changes.…”