2008
DOI: 10.17161/kwpl.1808.3926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can prosodic cues accurately identify constituent boundaries with cross-dialectal homophones? With as a particle in the Minnesota English Dialect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…scissor). Verbal particles not (yet) widespread in American English are used here, such as with in the sense of ‘along,’ parallel to the separable prefixes of German, such as mit (see Spartz 2010). While come with is an established stereotype, some speakers use and accept go with to mean ‘to be with’ (e.g., “We’re calling from Sheboygan.” “Oh, are the kids with ?”), and so on.…”
Section: The Effects Of German On Wisconsin Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scissor). Verbal particles not (yet) widespread in American English are used here, such as with in the sense of ‘along,’ parallel to the separable prefixes of German, such as mit (see Spartz 2010). While come with is an established stereotype, some speakers use and accept go with to mean ‘to be with’ (e.g., “We’re calling from Sheboygan.” “Oh, are the kids with ?”), and so on.…”
Section: The Effects Of German On Wisconsin Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%