2016
DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2016.1166161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can preferences in information processing aid in understanding suicide risk among emerging adults?

Abstract: The present study evaluated emerging adult (n = 192 college students) preferences in information processing (PIP), defined by the need for affect (NFA) and need for cognition (NFC), as they may be associated with suicide risk. The following were direct indicators of elevated suicide risk: presence of lifetime exposure to suicide (i.e., lifetime yes/no), elevated depressive symptoms, and greater NFA avoidance. Two different interactions resulted in elevated suicide risk: high depressive symptoms and high NFA av… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Items are measured on a 5-point scale. Internal consistency values have been high in prior studies (Cramer et al, 2016;Lord & Putrevu, 2006). Cronbach's alpha for the present study was good (.88).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Items are measured on a 5-point scale. Internal consistency values have been high in prior studies (Cramer et al, 2016;Lord & Putrevu, 2006). Cronbach's alpha for the present study was good (.88).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…NFC is defined as the extent of one's preference for effortful thinking, complexity, and mentalization (Cacioppo & Petty, 1996). NFA and NFC, therefore, constitute attitudes or preferences concerning emotional (i.e., system 1) and cognitive (i.e., system 2) information processing (Cramer et al, 2016). NFC and NFA have, independently and jointly, been widely applied to a range of outcomes such as perceptions of hate crimes (Cramer et al, 2013) and political beliefs (Arceneaux & Vander Wielen, 2013).…”
Section: Preferences In Information Processing: Theory and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations