2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00497-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Predictive Models for Prostate Cancer Patients Derived in the United States of America Be Utilized in European Patients? A Validation Study of the Partin Tables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
23
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Area under curve (AUC) values has been assessed previously for evaluating the predictability of Partin tables in external validation studies [11,12,14,15]. The ideal predictions are donated with 100 % accuracy and values of 50 % or less indicates that the model cannot predict the desired outcome but rather describes the only random Despite the apparent differences in pre-operative variables of our cohort and the derivation cohort of updated Partin's table, the predicted accuracy for the final pathological status was good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Area under curve (AUC) values has been assessed previously for evaluating the predictability of Partin tables in external validation studies [11,12,14,15]. The ideal predictions are donated with 100 % accuracy and values of 50 % or less indicates that the model cannot predict the desired outcome but rather describes the only random Despite the apparent differences in pre-operative variables of our cohort and the derivation cohort of updated Partin's table, the predicted accuracy for the final pathological status was good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Many nomograms have been developed for providing diagnostic, staging and prognostic information in patients with prostate cancer [9]. Oesterling et al [10] [2,11,12] and showed that these tables can be applied to other population cohorts as well. The Partin's table was updated in 2007 by Makarove et al [13] and its accuracy and discriminative properties have been questioned in various external validation studies [7,14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After radical prostatectomy (RP), patients with OCPC have an excellent prognosis, as more than 90% of them are free from biochemical recurrence at 5 years [24,25] . Since the introduction of the Partin tables in 1997, investigators have repeatedly validated the nomograms' capacity to help predict the pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate cancer [46][47][48] . In 2001, the nomograms were updated based on a more contemporary cohort of disease features [28] .…”
Section: Detection Of Ocpc (Pt2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2001, the nomograms were updated based on a more contemporary cohort of disease features [28] . The accuracy of the Partin tables in predicting OCPC is high, with reports of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 [46][47][48] . MR findings (from endorectal MRI or combined endorectal MRI-MRSI) contribute significant incremental value to clinical staging nomograms in the prediction of OCPC.…”
Section: Detection Of Ocpc (Pt2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand their accuracy is still an argument of discussion [21,11]. Moreover, some important limits exists also for the Partins Tables: they consider only a limited part of the population of prostate cancer patients and, furthermore, it has been showed that their algorithm overestimate the presence of lymph node and seminal vesicle involvement in patients with a predicted risk of 40% or more [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%