Can phytogenic additives replace monensin sodium in beef cattle feeding?

Assis, M. C. de; Costa, Gabriela Rayane da Rocha; Dias, Francisca Mônica Couras; Silva, Camila Sousa da; Lima, Jucelane Salvino de; Torres, Thaysa Rodrigues; Silva, Dulciene Karla de Andrade; Souza, Evaristo Jorge Oliveira de

doi:10.1007/s11250-023-03522-6

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Dietary monensin inclusion leads to energetic advantages by modifying ruminal microbial populations, which results in increased propionate proportion and decreased CH 4 production [6]. However, there is rising global interest in removing antibiotics, such as ionophores, from livestock diets, and consequently, phytogenic feed additives have been explored for their potential use in ruminant livestock diets [7][8][9][10]. Recent studies have demonstrated that Yucca schidigera extract (YSE) supplementation increased the average daily gain and feed efficiency of finishing cattle when included in the diet at up to 4 g/d [11,12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Anti-Coccidial Compounds and Phytogenic Saponin Extracts on In Vitro and In Vivo Ruminal Fermentation and Methane Production of Cattle

Trotta

Kreikemeier²,

Foote³

et al. 2023

Animals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Four experiments were conducted to evaluate sources of anti-coccidial compounds and phytogenic saponin extracts on in vitro and in vivo ruminal fermentation and CH4 production at multiple inclusion levels. In experiment 1, eight steers were fed either a finishing diet or a finishing diet supplemented with 0.5 mg/kg BW decoquinate (DCQ) and 3.33 mg/kg BW Yucca schidigera extract (YSE), and respiratory gas exchange was measured. In experiment 2, four ruminally-cannulated steers were fed the same treatments as experiment 1, and ruminal fermentation was evaluated. Anti-coccidial sources (experiment 3; monensin, DCQ, amprolium) and saponin sources (experiment 4; YSE, Quillaja saponaria extract) and levels were evaluated for effects on in vitro ruminal fermentation and CH4 production. DCQ + YSE supplementation did not influence (p ≥ 0.24) in vivo respiratory gas consumption/production, in situ DM degradation, or liquid passage kinetics. Ruminal propionate proportion tended to increase (p = 0.09) with DCQ + YSE. Monensin decreased (p ≤ 0.04) in vitro acetate:propionate and CH4 production; saponin supplementation linearly increased (p < 0.01) propionate proportion but did not influence (p ≥ 0.38) in vitro CH4 production. Saponins and non-antibiotic anti-coccidials did not influence in vitro or in vivo CH4 production with finishing diets.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Anti-Coccidial Compounds and Phytogenic Saponin Extracts on In Vitro and In Vivo Ruminal Fermentation and Methane Production of Cattle

Trotta

Kreikemeier²,

Foote³

et al. 2023

Animals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These compounds function by selectively targeting specific microbial populations in the rumen, leading to a reduction in methane production. Monensin, in particular, has been documented to decrease methane emissions by modulating the rumen microbial ecosystem, favoring more efficient microbial communities and diminishing the prevalence of methanogens [113]. While traditionally employed for improving feed conversion and disease prevention, the role of ionophores in reducing methane emissions offers a significant environmental advantage.…”

Section: Role Of Ionophores and Monensin In Emission Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Dairy Farming in Canada amidst Climate Change

Neethirajan

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the Canadian dairy sector has faced escalating challenges due to its significant contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane. This paper critically examines a spectrum of innovative techniques aimed at mitigating methane emissions within this sector, scrutinizing their cost-effectiveness, efficiency, compatibility with animal welfare standards, and adherence to both existing and prospective Canadian environmental legislations. The discourse begins with an exhaustive overview of contemporary methane reduction methodologies relevant to dairy farming, followed by a rigorous analysis of their economic feasibility. This includes a detailed cost-benefit analysis, juxtaposed with the efficiency and technological advancements these techniques embody. A pivotal aspect of this examination is the alignment of animal welfare with emission reduction objectives, ensuring that the strategies employed do not compromise the health and well-being of dairy cattle. Furthermore, the paper delves into the legislative landscape of Canada, evaluating the congruence of these techniques with current environmental laws and anticipating future regulatory shifts. Performance indicators for emission reduction are critically assessed, establishing benchmarks tailored to the Canadian context. This is complemented by an exploration of the market potential of these innovations, including factors influencing their adoption and scalability in the market. The analysis culminates with a synthesis of case studies and best practices within Canada, offering insights into successful implementations and drawing lessons for future endeavors. This comprehensive approach not only addresses the immediate environmental and health impacts associated with dairy farming emissions but also significantly contributes to the overarching goal of sustainable development in the agricultural sector. The research presented in this paper holds significant implications for the future of sustainable dairy farming, offering a model for addressing environmental challenges while maintaining economic viability and animal welfare.

show abstract