2019
DOI: 10.1089/photob.2019.4696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Photobiomodulation Therapy Be an Alternative to Methylprednisolone in Reducing Pain, Swelling, and Trismus After Removal of Impacted Third Molars?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that edema after third molar surgery is also caused by inflammatory processes triggered by surgical trauma (Feslihan et al, 2019), it was expected that pain reduction would be followed by a reduction in edema. The measurements of edema showed low scores for both groups, indicating acceptable edema control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that edema after third molar surgery is also caused by inflammatory processes triggered by surgical trauma (Feslihan et al, 2019), it was expected that pain reduction would be followed by a reduction in edema. The measurements of edema showed low scores for both groups, indicating acceptable edema control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of edema can be compared to the complexity of the surgery (Feslihan et al, 2019). Thus, patients with a similar degree of teeth impaction were chosen and operative time was comparable to reveal no intergroup bias in the studies included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, lasers were used both intraorally and extraorally, and the laser's parameters were as follows: wavelengths ranged from 632 to 1064 nm; powers were between 4 and 1000 mW; energy densities were between 3 and 212 J/cm 2 . Eleven articles reported no statistically significant difference of PBM on reducing pain in comparison with placebo [25,38,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47]51,57]. The lasers used in these studies were diode lasers with wavelengths of 660 nm, 810 nm, and 980 nm, different powers (30-500 mW) and energy densities (2-60 J/cm 2 ).…”
Section: Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial swelling was assessed in 36 studies [23,25,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]53,54,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. Nineteen articles reported significant decrease in facial swelling after PBM application when compared with placebo [25,[27][28][29][30][31][32]39,40,[48][49][50]53,54,56,59,61,63].…”
Section: Facial Swellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of swelling was evaluated by using the method of Feslihan and Eroğlu [29]. The baseline facial distance was calculated, using a flexible tape, immediately before surgery as the arithmetic mean of three facial linear measurements: the labial commissure -tragus, the gonion -lateral canthus, and the gonion -labial commissure.…”
Section: Measurement Of Pain Swelling and Trismusmentioning
confidence: 99%