2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2008.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can perpetual learning explain the forward-premium puzzle?

Abstract: Under rational expectations and risk neutrality the linear projection of exchange rate change on the forward premium has a unit coefficient. However, empirical estimates of this coefficient are significantly less than one and often negative. We investigate whether replacing rational expectations by discounted least squares (or "perpetual") learning can explain the result. We calculate the asymptotic bias under perpetual learning and show that there is a negative bias that becomes strongest when the fundamental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
43
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these 27 For a more analytical exposition on how learning dynamics leads to opposite movements in the forward premium and exchange rate changes, see Chakraborty (2004).…”
Section: Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these 27 For a more analytical exposition on how learning dynamics leads to opposite movements in the forward premium and exchange rate changes, see Chakraborty (2004).…”
Section: Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is that the regression incorporates an omitted variable bias because the error term in the regression equation and Lewis (1993). Interested readers may also refer to Oh and Pippenger(1994), Mark and Wu(1998), Mark (2001) and Chakraborty (2004).…”
Section: The Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chakraborty and Evans (2008) focus on the forward-premium puzzle. Letting s t be the log of the price of foreign currency and F t the log of the forward rate at t for foreign currency at t + 1, under RE and risk neutrality we have α = 0 and β = 1 in the forward-premium regression s t+1 − s t = α + β(F t − s t ) + u t+1 .…”
Section: Asset Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first well known equation tying the future spot rate to the forward one is called "naïve regression" or "Levels regression", it was widely studied by Cornell (1977), Beljer & Khan (1980), Frankel (1981, Fama (1984), Barnhart and Szakmary (1991), McCallum (1994), Hai et al (1997), Roll & Yan (2000), Chakraborty & Haynes (2008), Chakraborty & Evans (2008), Thornton (2007), and so on……”
mentioning
confidence: 99%