Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment intervention.DesignA multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial.SettingClusters were 33 hospital wards within five hospitals in the UK.ParticipantsAll patients able to give informed consent were eligible to take part. Wards were allocated to the intervention or control condition.InterventionThe ward-level intervention comprised two tools: (1) a questionnaire that asked patients about factors contributing to safety (patient measure of safety (PMOS)) and (2) a proforma for patients to report both safety concerns and positive experiences (patient incident reporting tool). Feedback was considered in multidisciplinary action planning meetings.MeasurementsPrimary outcomes were routinely collected ward-level harm-free care (HFC) scores and patient-level feedback on safety (PMOS).ResultsIntervention uptake and retention of wards was 100% and patient participation was high (86%). We found no significant effect of the intervention on any outcomes at 6 or 12 months. However, for new harms (ie, those for which the wards were directly accountable) intervention wards did show greater, though non-significant, improvement compared with control wards. Analyses also indicated that improvements were largest for wards that showed the greatest compliance with the intervention.LimitationsAdherence to the intervention, particularly the implementation of action plans, was poor. Patient safety outcomes may represent too blunt a measure.ConclusionsPatients are willing to provide feedback about the safety of their care. However, we were unable to demonstrate any overall effect of this intervention on either measure of patient safety and therefore cannot recommend this intervention for wider uptake. Findings indicate promise for increasing HFC where wards implement ≥75% of the intervention components.Trial registration numberISRCTN07689702; pre-results.

A qualitative study of patient involvement in medicines management after hospital discharge: an under-recognised source of systems resilience

“…Resilience in healthcare has previously been described and understood mainly from organisational and staff perspectives 26–28 57. This study has thus offered an increased understanding of patients as agents of resilience and we have highlighted where there are opportunities to strengthen resilience, for example through facilitating patient reporting of safety concerns 58. Using resilience as a theoretical concept to explore patient interventions to prevent errors has provided a view of patients as integral system components, rather than as recipients of treatment in a healthcare system.…”

Every patient should be enabled to stop the line

“…While some studies, including those involving patient-initiated and family-initiated rapid response systems, suggest a potential safety benefit,612 others lack definitive evidence 26. But are we using the right yardsticks?…”

Exploring how ward staff engage with the implementation of a patient safety intervention: a UK-based qualitative process evaluation

“…The components of the intervention have been reported in detail elsewhere,8 as have the results of the randomised controlled trial which demonstrated no statistically significant effect between the intervention and control wards 9. A feasibility study was undertaken prior to commencement of the full RCT and details of our logic model and moderating factors are reported in the feasibility write up 7.…”