Can Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) Be Used in China?

Fu, Yixiao; Hou, Xiao; Qin, Qing; Meng, Huaqing; Xie, Peng; Huang, Yi Jing; Xiao-hong, MA; Deng, Wei; Luo, Qiang; Wang, Yingcheng; Hu, Hua; Du, Lian; Qiu, Hu; Qiu, Tian; Li, Tao

doi:10.4236/psych.2013.46076

Cited by 29 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar steps of construct validity assessment were found in the Turkish validation study (Önder and Gülay 2009). However, criterion validity of PSDQ Bangla cannot be assessed because of the lack of culturally adapted instruments, which is supported by previous studies (Fu et al 2013;Arafat et al 2016Arafat et al , 2017Arafat 2016). The number of factors of the PSDQ Bangla based on eigenvalues obtained from PCA and a total of three factors were found, which is similar with the original scale (Robinson et al 1995).…”

Section: Forms Of Validitysupporting

confidence: 78%

“…The number of factors of the PSDQ Bangla based on eigenvalues obtained from PCA and a total of three factors were found, which is similar with the original scale (Robinson et al 1995). Other validation studies also revealed similar three factorial structures, that is, authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive domain, which is also supported by Baumrind's ground work (Robinson et al 1995;Önder and Gülay 2009;Fu et al 2013;Olivari et al 2013;Kern and Jonyniene 2012;Morowatisharifabad et al 2016) LIMITATIONS: The evaluation of psychometric properties of the PSDQ Bangla revealed acceptable values that justify the scale to assess parenting style in Bangladesh. To the author's best knowledge, this is the first study to report on the psychometric properties of the Bangla version of PSDQ.…”

Section: Forms Of Validitysupporting

confidence: 67%

“…The Italian validation study also revealed acceptable reliability in all three domains of the scale, although these were measured by confirmatory factor analysis (Tagliabue et al 2014). The Chinese validation study revealed that the Cronbach's alpha of each subscale was between 0.62 and 0.86 (Fu et al 2013). The Lithuanian 32-item PSDQ revealed the Cronbach's alpha for the authoritative domain was 0.85, the authoritarian domain was 0.76, and the permissive domain was 0.58 (Kern and Jonyniene 2012).…”

Section: Reliability-internal Consistencymentioning

confidence: 95%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Validation of Bangla parenting style and dimension questionnaire

Arafat

2018

Global Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThere has been a plethora of studies conducted on different aspects of parenting and how it affects children. However, assessment of parenting style and dimension is untouched in Bangladesh. The Parenting Style and Dimension Questionnaire (PSDQ) is a self-reporting questionnaire responded by parents regarding their parenting practices, which assesses the three categories of parenting styles, namely, authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive. It was aimed to adapt and validate PSDQ in Bangla which is the mother tongue of the people of Bangladesh.MethodsThe validation study was conducted from January 2017 to June 2018 in three schools of Dhaka city with the self-reporting semi-structured Bangla version of PSDQ. The adaptation of PSDQ to Bangla was performed according to the state-of-the-art procedure of forward–backward translation. Parents having children aged 6–16 years were approached through schools to participate in the study. Data were collected from 349 parents and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science version 16.0 software.ResultsCronbach’s alpha of PSDQ Bangla was 0.84, which signifies a good internal consistency. Cronbach’s alpha of authoritative domain was 0.95, authoritarian domain 0.88, and permissive domain 0.78. A total of three factors were extracted using exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation after discarding four items that had poor correlation and factor loading values. The three extracted factors were authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive; these are similar with the initial three dimensions of PSDQ.ConclusionsCurrent study resulted in PSDQ Bangla, which retains 35 items in 3 domains with distribution of 20 items in authoritative domain, 9 items in authoritarian domain, and 6 items in permissive domain. The 35-item PSDQ Bangla can be a psychometrically reliable and valid tool to use in clinical setting of psychiatric practices in Bangladesh, especially to deal with child psychiatric disorders.

show abstract

Section: Forms Of Validitysupporting

confidence: 78%

Section: Forms Of Validitysupporting

confidence: 67%

Section: Reliability-internal Consistencymentioning

confidence: 95%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of Bangla parenting style and dimension questionnaire

Arafat

2018

Global Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We assessed parenting styles using the modified 26-item PSDQ developed by Robinson et al (2001). This instrument is an appropriate measure of parenting among parents of preschool and school-age children (Robinson, Mandleco, Olsen, & Hart, 1995), exhibits internal consistency reliability for a sample of parents rearing preschool children in the United States (Winsler, Madigan, & Aquilino, 2005), and is a reliable and valid measure of parenting styles for parents in China (Fu et al, 2013). Authoritative parenting comprises three dimensions: (a) Warmth/Acceptance (seven items; e.g., “Expresses affection by hugging, kissing, and holding child”), (b) Reasoning/Induction (four items; e.g., “Talks it over and reasons with child when misbehaving”), and (c) Democratic Participation (four items; e.g., “Allows child to give input into family rules”; Wu et al, 2002, p. 485).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study on Parenting of Preschool Children Between the Chinese in China and Chinese Immigrants in the United States

Chen

Ping

Zu-wei

2015

Journal of Family Issues

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this questionnaire-based study was to compare the relative endorsement of specific parenting patterns among two ethnic Chinese groups rearing preschool children: Chinese parents in China (N = 117) and first-generation Chinese immigrant parents in the United States (N = 94). A significant interaction effect was found between country and gender on the nonreasoning/punitive dimension of authoritarian parenting, revealing that Chinese fathers endorsed this pattern more strongly than both Chinese immigrant fathers and Chinese mothers. There was also a significant interaction effect between country and gender on the practice of shaming/ love withdrawal, indicating that Chinese fathers espoused this pattern more strongly than Chinese immigrant fathers and Chinese mothers, but Chinese immigrant mothers endorsed it more strongly than Chinese immigrant fathers. Furthermore, it was revealed that Chinese immigrants endorsed beliefs about maternal involvement more strongly than their Chinese counterparts. The results are discussed in the context of cultural and contextual influences.

show abstract

“…A review of this measure by Locke and Prinz (2002) recognized it as psychometrically justifiable in assessing child rearing and disciplining practices. It was also found to be age-appropriate for parents of preschoolers and school-age children, exhibiting an internal consistency reliability when measuring parents of preschoolers in the United States (Robinson et al, 1995) and in China (Fu et al, 2013). What's more, the measure was found to be reliable for maternal and paternal self-reported parenting styles of Chinese and Chinese immigrant parents (Chen et al, 2015), with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from .59 to .72.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 96%