2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.1530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Parameters Other Than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the common advantage of both cohorts for multistage method over a single parameter was the enhancement of speci city and sensitivity, different from shifting a single cutoff value from 5 mm to 6 mm that results in the sacri ce of sensitivity. Table 3 Results of multistage and two conventional criteria for 410 nodes in our previous report [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the common advantage of both cohorts for multistage method over a single parameter was the enhancement of speci city and sensitivity, different from shifting a single cutoff value from 5 mm to 6 mm that results in the sacri ce of sensitivity. Table 3 Results of multistage and two conventional criteria for 410 nodes in our previous report [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI and FDG PET/CT scans were conducted less than 3 weeks apart (mean ± SD = 2.5 ± 6.0; range: 0-17 days) before cancer treatment. The details of imaging protocols for MRI (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) and PET/CT (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and the methods of measurement of nodal parameters were identical to those described in our previous reports [23,24]. Three experienced NPC physicians (Yu-Wen Wang, Yu-Cheng Hung, and Yu-Kang Chang) evaluated the data in this study.…”
Section: Imaging Protocol and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations