2022
DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.19746484
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can OpenEHR, ISO 13606 and HL7 FHIR work together? An agnostic perspective for the selection and application of EHR standards from Spain

Abstract: <p>Due to the heterogeneity of Electronic Health Record (EHR) standards, the decision-making teams, who are not experts in health information, express confusion for selecting and applying these resources in their data platforms. For this reason, a group of experts has analyzed strengths and weaknesses about design, modeling capabilities, flexibility and resources implemented of three relevant standards based on Detailed Clinical Models: OpenEHR, ISO 13606 and HL7 FHIR. Thus, it was concluded that: (1) th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, by modeling ontologies of other standards and mapping them to local variables, we may, for example, carry out transformations between EN/ISO 13606, OpenEHR [ 21 ], Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) [ 22 ], OMOP CDM, and Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) [ 23 ] with the minimum use of resources and without the need for changes in the database structure. Health information standards such as EN/ISO 13606 and OpenEHR allow the modeling and formalization of clinical knowledge through their RMs and archetypes [ 24 ], and ontologies are precisely a tool for carrying out such tasks. This is what makes them ideal in the context of an implementation of a dual-model strategy, allowing the representation of concepts in the health domain, its standardization, and the storage of instantiated patient data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, by modeling ontologies of other standards and mapping them to local variables, we may, for example, carry out transformations between EN/ISO 13606, OpenEHR [ 21 ], Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) [ 22 ], OMOP CDM, and Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) [ 23 ] with the minimum use of resources and without the need for changes in the database structure. Health information standards such as EN/ISO 13606 and OpenEHR allow the modeling and formalization of clinical knowledge through their RMs and archetypes [ 24 ], and ontologies are precisely a tool for carrying out such tasks. This is what makes them ideal in the context of an implementation of a dual-model strategy, allowing the representation of concepts in the health domain, its standardization, and the storage of instantiated patient data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, other standard-agnostic approaches have been reported in the literature. The ongoing INFOBANCO project of the Madrid Region [ 32 ] seeks to create a platform for the management, persistence, exchange, and reuse of health data focused on applying each health information standard for the purpose it was intended to, offering multiple interoperability and exploitation services suited for specific use cases [ 24 ]. Furthermore, the 3-pillar strategy of the Swiss Personalized Health Network [ 33 ] pursues a semantically interoperable clinical data landscape based on a multidimensional encoding of concepts, an RDF-based storage and transport of the instances of these concepts and a conversion of RDF to any target data model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the INFOBANCO project of the Madrid Region in Spain [ 28 ] aims to create a platform for the management, persistence, exchange, and reuse of health data, contemplating 2 types of outputs: interoperability (HL7 FHIR, EN/ISO 13606, Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium [CDISC] [ 29 ]) and persistence (OpenEHR, i2b2, Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model [OMOP CDM]). It uses a standard-agnostic design that seeks to apply each health information standard for the purpose it was intended to, offering multiple interoperability and exploitation services suited for specific use cases [ 12 ]. However, these projects focus on the creation of interoperable platforms for different purposes, but they do not include a strategy for integrating information coming from mobile apps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework enables medical apps to be written once and run unmodified across different health care IT systems and has proven to be an effective approach for interoperability. FHIR offers operational mechanisms for data exchange, but unlike EN/ISO 13606, it lacks the capacity to build new concepts based on specific requirements [ 12 ], which limits its flexibility to adapt to new scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation