2004
DOI: 10.1177/147078530404600102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Online Polls Produce Accurate Findings?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Those advocating the use of non-probability samples sometimes assert that established methodologies (such as probability sampling) are undermined by inevitably low response rates (e.g., Gosling et al 2004: 99;Kellner 2004). The evidence reported here showing no relation of completion rates to accuracy across non-probability samples reinforces the notion that such criticisms are misdirected.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those advocating the use of non-probability samples sometimes assert that established methodologies (such as probability sampling) are undermined by inevitably low response rates (e.g., Gosling et al 2004: 99;Kellner 2004). The evidence reported here showing no relation of completion rates to accuracy across non-probability samples reinforces the notion that such criticisms are misdirected.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Conclusion (1) is useful because probability sample surveys routinely come under attack, being accused of inaccuracy (e.g., Kellner 2004). Such assertions may sometimes be motivated because a survey's result is not in keeping with what an individual or organization wants to believe is true of the population and may sometimes be motivated by organizations that wish to unseat probability sampling methodology with an alternative approach to social measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of traditional telephone or face-to-face survey methods argue that biases in sampling may be introduced if the panel is selected over the Internet (access to those who are more technologically aware, away from the poor, or employed in certain jobs) (10). Online polling firms can point to flaws in traditional surveys such as telephone surveys being biased toward those who are home at the right time, excluding those who use mobile phones as their main telephone, and that people tend to conceal responses when traditional survey methods are used (11). All surveys seek to correct their samples for nonresponse bias to ensure a representative sample.…”
Section: Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no perfect option, and no consensus regarding which is the best approach. This means that the Otávio Bandeira De Lamônica Freire, Diego dos Santos Vega Senise, Walney Barbosa dos Reis e Heder Seiti Ono reliability of online methods cannot be judged appropriately in comparison with traditional research (Kellner, 2004). In other words, both techniques have their pros and cons, and it falls to researchers to choose the one that is best suited to their purposes.…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%