Minority Accommodation Through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy 2015
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746669.003.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Non-Territorial Autonomy Bring an Added Value to Theoretic and Policy-Oriented Analysis of Ethnic Politics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars disagree on the exact hierarchical relationship between the two concepts. For example, Wolff (2011) and Nootens (2015) argue that territorial self-government or devices of self-governance (respectively) are umbrella categories under which territorial autonomy falls. In contrast, Lapidoth (1997, 53–54) presents self-government as “one room” in the “house” of autonomy and Suksi (2014, 54–55) also differentiates territorial autonomy from regional self-government in terms of the powers given to the sub-state unit where regional self-governments have less power than territorial autonomies.…”
Section: Autonomy As a Concept: What Autonomy Is And Is Notmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars disagree on the exact hierarchical relationship between the two concepts. For example, Wolff (2011) and Nootens (2015) argue that territorial self-government or devices of self-governance (respectively) are umbrella categories under which territorial autonomy falls. In contrast, Lapidoth (1997, 53–54) presents self-government as “one room” in the “house” of autonomy and Suksi (2014, 54–55) also differentiates territorial autonomy from regional self-government in terms of the powers given to the sub-state unit where regional self-governments have less power than territorial autonomies.…”
Section: Autonomy As a Concept: What Autonomy Is And Is Notmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will therefore come as no surprise that all of the definitional efforts and political or legal designations as minorities, nationalities, co-nations or sub-state nations remain language games in actual practice as long as the civic-ethnic dichotomy is not overcome. All the efforts to politically or constitutionally distinguish between (ethnic) groups, (national) minorities, (indigenous) peoples and nations (Nootens 2015), with the aim of denying the former two groupings of people a (justiciable) right to (external) self-determination, only conceal the asymmetric power relations within so-called mono-national as well as multinational states, frequently following from historical identity politics based on political symbolism and the rhetoric of firstcomers versus invaders or of a security dilemma threatening possession of a territory, as we tried to show with the seven rules of nationalism (see Box 4.2) in Chapter 4.…”
Section: Box 52 Three Different Meanings Of Ethnicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-territorial autonomy is an umbrella term encompassing concepts such as 'personal', 'functional' or 'cultural' autonomy. To make things more confusing, some of these terms may have different meanings for different authors (Nootens 2015;Suksi 2014Suksi , 2016. For Tkacik (2008), functional autonomy means the decentralisation of control over a single functional subject matter.…”
Section: The Right To Internal Self-determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nootens highlights a current consensus in the literature that autonomy is consistent with and conducive to integration. She stresses the importance of the recognition of ethno-cultural differences as well as the need to ensure the political, economic and cultural participation of members of minority groups in the public sphere in order to enhance such conceptions of autonomy (Nootens, 2015). However, she adds that the recognition of national minorities as cultural-linguistic groups may also become a powerful tool for national states to limit the range of claims such groups can make against the different ways in which the hegemony of a majority group may be exercised (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, she adds that the recognition of national minorities as cultural-linguistic groups may also become a powerful tool for national states to limit the range of claims such groups can make against the different ways in which the hegemony of a majority group may be exercised (i.e. dominance may manifest itself not only in the area of culture but also in economic and political spheres) (Nootens, 2015). Moreover, Prina notes that, in effect, many autonomy arrangements have disempowered minority groups (Prina, 2020) or have the potential to do so, as demonstrated by the case discussed here of the Hungarian minority in Romania.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%