Can Money Buy Happiness? Subjective Wellbeing and Its Relationship with Income, Relative Income, Monetary and Non-monetary Poverty in Bangladesh

Abstract

This paper presents an empirical analysis of the importance of income, relative income, monetary and non-monetary poverty for individual wellbeing or happiness in rural Bangladesh. The study is the first estimate of a wellbeing function for Bangladesh using nationally representative micro-panel data. Employing a linear panel model with individual random effects and a large set of control variables like education, working status and disability, we found a strong and positive relationship between wellbeing and income. Being further below the poverty lineestimated using the depth-ofpoverty measurewas found to have a significant negative effect on happiness. On the other hand, the income of the reference group was found to be just as important as one's own income for an individual's happiness. Comparisons were found to be asymmetric and upwards. Improvements in a multidimensional poverty index, constructed using indicators of household education, health and living standards, were found to have a positive and significant relationship with happiness in all specifications.Gender-disaggregated analysis reveals that, while the income effect was found to be stronger for male individuals, the effects of relative income, monetary and nonmonetary poverty on subjective wellbeing are larger for female individuals. The results thus point towards a need to incorporate such notions into the assessment of individuals' wellbeing.

Social capital and the effectiveness of land use policies: Evidence from rural China

“…For example, in his study of neighbourhood satisfaction, Mouratidis (2020) found that the linear regression models returned R-squares of between 0.048 and 0.161. Similar results were also obtained by studies on both the specific aspect of satisfaction (i.e., residential satisfaction in Ren and Folmer, 2017) and general subjective wellbeing (Tauseef, 2021).…”

Does food safety perception matter to farmers’ happiness？ evidence from China

“…Since the emergence of the Easterlin Paradox, scholars have tried to crack the happiness code from different perspectives [ 14 ]. From absolute income to relative income to income inequality, income has been an important focus of scholarly attention [ 5 , [15] , [16] , [17] ]. In addition, there have been a variety of studies on the relationship between happiness and socio-demographic factors, such as age, gender, education, marital status, health status, housing status and religious beliefs [ 6 , [18] , [19] , [20] ].…”

The welfare effects of impoverished rural areas: Review and research prospects

“…The essence of the rural welfare effect requires the government to meet the basic needs of the rural population through institutionalized social security based on legislation, improve rural poverty, achieve universal welfare, and provide individual farmers with basic livelihood welfare such as basic employment, basic medical care, basic pension and so on [ 17 ]. Recently, farmers' psychological satisfaction and happiness are believed to be the most critical factors of the welfare effect [ 18 ].…”