2012
DOI: 10.1257/app.4.4.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Mobile Phones Improve Learning? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Niger

Abstract: The returns to educational investments hinge on whether such investments can improve the quality and persistence of educational gains. This has been a challenge in adult education programs, which are typically characterized by rapid skills depreciation. We report the results from a randomized evaluation of an adult education program (Project ABC) in Niger, in which adult students learned how to use simple mobile phones as part of a literacy and numeracy class. Overall, students demonstrated substantial improve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(10 reference statements)
3
70
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In Niger, for example, a field experiment randomly allocating mobile phones (and providing instruction in their use) to a subset of participants in a more traditional ALP led to substantial impacts on (writing) literacy and numeracy among the mobile phone recipients [1]. Specifically, students in mobile phone receiving villages (the randomization was at the village level to avoid contamination between treatment and control groups) achieved test scores that were between 0.19 and 0.26 standard deviations higher than those in the standard adult education classes, and their standardized mathematics test scores (though not their writing scores) remained higher seven months after the end of the classes.…”
Section: Literacy Impacts Can Be Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Niger, for example, a field experiment randomly allocating mobile phones (and providing instruction in their use) to a subset of participants in a more traditional ALP led to substantial impacts on (writing) literacy and numeracy among the mobile phone recipients [1]. Specifically, students in mobile phone receiving villages (the randomization was at the village level to avoid contamination between treatment and control groups) achieved test scores that were between 0.19 and 0.26 standard deviations higher than those in the standard adult education classes, and their standardized mathematics test scores (though not their writing scores) remained higher seven months after the end of the classes.…”
Section: Literacy Impacts Can Be Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Ghanaian NFLP seems particularly successful, as does a more recent ALP from Niger [1], [4], [5]. By contrast, many other ALPs have not been successful, especially in terms of increasing participants' literacy and numeracy skills (e.g.…”
Section: Niels-hugo Blunch | Adult Literacy Programs In Developing Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies and developments of mobile application in education are educational game (Zhang and Loeb, 2013), mobile learning system (Petrova, 2007;Sung, et.al., 2005) and interactive learning table (Wilson, 2011). Studies show that mobile applications give better result than desktop applications in language learning (Jarvis and Achilleos, 2013), help to get better skills in math and writing (Aker, Ksoll and Lybbert, 2011).…”
Section: Mobile Applications In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of mobile devices to support adult learning has been explored in a variety of contexts. Several studies have investigated the impact of mobile phones on learning outcomes in adult learning programmes among rural populations and poor communities in developing countries (Aker, Ksoll, and Lybbert 2012;Balasubramanian, Thamizoli, Umar, and Kanwar 2010). Others have examined the use of mobile devices to support intentional informal learning among experienced users (Clough, Jones, McAndrew, and Scanlon 2008) or the delivery of micro-contents through very simple mobile phones to fulfill the learning needs of lifelong learners (Gu, Gu, and Laffey 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%