2015
DOI: 10.1108/ijbm-06-2014-0080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can microfinance crowdfunding reduce financial exclusion? Regulatory issues

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss how regulatory environment can be a fundamental constraint or lever in defining the scope of operations of a social innovation. Design/methodology/approach – Semi-structured interviews with top-level executives of pioneers of crowdfunding were run in India and France, two of the three leading countries in this field. Findings – Fou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sustainability orientation was related to social innovation through appropriate technology [23], even with co-utility [51]. Furthermore, several articles [28,68] studied the effect of regulations on crowdfunding and social innovation, which is also a type of sustainability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainability orientation was related to social innovation through appropriate technology [23], even with co-utility [51]. Furthermore, several articles [28,68] studied the effect of regulations on crowdfunding and social innovation, which is also a type of sustainability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example of this in practice, Community Interest Companies in the United Kingdom are currently restricted from paying a dividend to investors in excess of 35 per cent of distributable profits (Marakkath and Attuel-Mendes, 2015). This firm would be considered a SC.…”
Section: Redistribution Of Profits (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, if they choose a = 1, then they prefer a zero real rate of investor return and higher social returns. As an example of this in practice, Community Interest Companies in the United Kingdom are currently restricted from paying a dividend to investors in excess of 35 per cent of distributable profits (Marakkath and Attuel-Mendes, 2015). As such, they are restricted to a ≥ 0.65.…”
Section: Redistribution Of Profits (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFIs intermediation costs to be brought much lower and thus to charge lower interest rates to borrowers [26]. This new medium of communication, by getting rid of geographical barriers in a more and more global village [27], allows to efficiently complete the action of microfinance to divide by two extreme poverty, as it is targeted in the first Millennium Development Goals developed by the United Nations.…”
Section: Crowdfunding As a Vehicle For Crowdmicrofinance Towards An mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platforms, as well as MFIs, must struggle for sustainability and profitability, be they lender-based model as Babyloan or borrower-based as Rang De. Regulatory barriers must be overtook in both cases [26], for instance, that of market limitation to investors within the European Union for the French platforms.…”
Section: Crowdfunding As a Vehicle For Crowdmicrofinance Towards An mentioning
confidence: 99%