2002
DOI: 10.3149/jmh.0101.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Male-Provided Social Support Buffer the Cardiovascular Responsivity to Stress in Men? It Depends on the Nature of the Support Provided

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CVR was associated with the functional, but not structural, indices of social support in the present study, which replicates previous findings (Craig and Deichert 2002). Structural indices have been found to be poor correlates of CVR to stress (Roy et al 1998) merely due to the limited, and sometimes misleading, information these measures provide.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The CVR was associated with the functional, but not structural, indices of social support in the present study, which replicates previous findings (Craig and Deichert 2002). Structural indices have been found to be poor correlates of CVR to stress (Roy et al 1998) merely due to the limited, and sometimes misleading, information these measures provide.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In particular, effect sizes differed as a function of evaluation potential of the support provider (i.e., low vs. high), mode of support (i.e., silent vs. active), and type of task (i.e., speech vs. math). These findings, along with subsequent work in the area highlight the importance of the support context when assessing links between received support and laboratory stress reactivity (e.g., Craig & Deichert, 2002; Holt-Lunstad, Uchino, Smith, & Hicks, 2007; O'Donovan & Hughes, 2008; Phillips, Gallagher, & Carroll, 2009). …”
Section: Links To Laboratory Reactivity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, a few studies have varied the type of support provided in order to directly compare the efficacy of different types of received support (Craig & Deichert, 2002; Uno, Uchino, & Smith, 2002; Wilson, Kliewer, Bayer, Jones, Welleford, Heiney, & Sica, 1999). These studies examined the matching hypothesis in the context of gender differences in preference for support (i.e., recipient factors).…”
Section: Links To Laboratory Reactivity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations