2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01576.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can malaria be controlled where basic health services are not used?

Abstract: If malaria patients are to be treated and followed-up early and appropriately, basic health services need to deliver integrated care and be attended by an adequate pool of users. Improved service user rates and case management can increase malaria cure rates far more than isolated control interventions can. This has implications for international policies endorsing a narrow disease-based approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Piot model is an operational analysis model that has proven useful for analyzing case management (passive case finding and treatment) in disease control programmes such as tuberculosis, malaria and sexually transmitted infections [ 15 , 16 ]. In the case of TB control the model describes the different steps that individuals in the community go through after becoming ill with symptoms related to TB until finally being cured by the TB control programme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Piot model is an operational analysis model that has proven useful for analyzing case management (passive case finding and treatment) in disease control programmes such as tuberculosis, malaria and sexually transmitted infections [ 15 , 16 ]. In the case of TB control the model describes the different steps that individuals in the community go through after becoming ill with symptoms related to TB until finally being cured by the TB control programme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these examples are from islands, fringes of endemic areas, smaller countries with significant external support, or from more developed countries outside sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Whether progress can be expected to be comparable in the majority of SSA countries under the existing scenario of prevailing poverty, weak infrastructure and management capacity, unreliable donor funding, underused health services, and high malaria transmission intensity, remains doubtful [17,18]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,15–20 Adequate coverage of malaria needs through health centre care, cannot be achieved if these services remain underused. 21 MSF experience shows that only when care is offered completely free-of-charge at the point of use for all, or at least for large vulnerable population groups, do the number of people accessing effective malarial treatment, especially those most at risk, increase significantly with a corresponding fall in case fatality rates. The beneficial impact of free care (in terms of increased health service utilisation, better coverage of essential health needs and reduced mortality rates) has similarly been widely reported from other settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%