2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019ms001705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Machines Learn to Predict Weather? Using Deep Learning to Predict Gridded 500‐hPa Geopotential Height From Historical Weather Data

Abstract: We develop elementary weather prediction models using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on past weather data to forecast one or two fundamental meteorological fields on a Northern Hemisphere grid with no explicit knowledge about physical processes. At forecast lead times up to 3 days, CNNs trained to predict only 500‐hPa geopotential height easily outperform persistence, climatology, and the dynamics‐based barotropic vorticity model, but do not beat an operational full‐physics weather predictio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
166
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
166
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is increasingly common in meteorology to use machine learning approaches for identifying patterns in the atmosphere using large amounts of historical data (Dueben & Bauer, ; Scher & Messori, ; Ukkonen & Mäkelä, ; Weyn et al, ). This approach, of extracting the underlying physical relationships in the atmosphere from data, opens an opportunity to explore new algorithms that optimize the output based on different verification metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is increasingly common in meteorology to use machine learning approaches for identifying patterns in the atmosphere using large amounts of historical data (Dueben & Bauer, ; Scher & Messori, ; Ukkonen & Mäkelä, ; Weyn et al, ). This approach, of extracting the underlying physical relationships in the atmosphere from data, opens an opportunity to explore new algorithms that optimize the output based on different verification metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such work has been done in the past for atmospheric dynamics and, more generally, for chaotic dynamical systems [1,2,3,4], including ocean dynamics [5]. Another approach involves using the resolved field of a complex chaotic and turbulent flow directly in a data-driven model to be trained on and subsequently evolved forward in time as has been shown in [6,7,8,9]. The assumption here, is that the data-driven model learns the effects of the unresolved or under-resolved sub-grid scale processes directly on the resolved field from a long time history of the fields in the training dataset.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), [37] and [39] trained an algorithm on simulations from a simplified GCM that significantly outperformed baseline metrics and effectively captured the simplified-GCM dynamics. [43], hereafter WDC19, trained CNNs similar to those of [37] and [39] with over 20 years of historical reanalysis data to produce forecasts of 500 hPa height and 300-700 hPa thickness over the northern hemisphere. Their best CNN formulation was able to outperform a climatological benchmark for root-mean-squared error (RMSE) in the 500 hPa height field out to about 5 days of forecast lead time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%