2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can lung ultrasonography predict prone positioning response in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Before initiating PP, bedside LUS did not differentiate the two groups in contrast with a previous study [33]. In the supine position, a normal pattern of anterobasal regions was associated with the oxygenation response.…”
Section: Oxygenation Response To Ppcontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Before initiating PP, bedside LUS did not differentiate the two groups in contrast with a previous study [33]. In the supine position, a normal pattern of anterobasal regions was associated with the oxygenation response.…”
Section: Oxygenation Response To Ppcontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Haddam et al found that oxygenation response after PP was not correlated with a specific LUS pattern [5], whereas Prat et al found that a normal LUS pattern of both anterobasal lung regions in supine position may predict a significant P/F ratio improvement [19]. One of the possible reasons for that difference was both of the studies chose oxygenation improvement as the index of the response, and we found that the oxygenation improvement did not correlate with the improvement in lung aeration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static compliance during PP session increased from 23 (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) to 27 (20-37) mL/cmH 2 O (P < 0.01), corresponding to a VT and a corrected minute ventilation increase from 4.2 (3.3-5.4) to 5.6 (3.8-6.4) mL/kg and 5.5 (4.3-6.8) to 6.2 (5.1-6.9) L/min (P = 0.04), respectively. Consequently, local compliance variations, which is calculated based on local impedance variation compared to baseline, increased by 120 (60-180) % at the end of PP (Fig.…”
Section: Static Global Compliance Local Compliance Variation and Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We rather chose to analyze the PP impact on respiratory mechanics, using compliance to evaluate PP response. We performed a subgroup analysis differentiating patients with a compliance gain (PCG+) after 16 h of PP, defined by an increase ≥ 3 mL/cmH 2 O compared to baseline (i.e., SP) [9,10,29], and patients with no compliance gain (PCG−). We arbitrarily chose that definition by considering that a VT increase of > 40 mL after PP would be more likely to represent a "true" compliance gain rather than an inherent measurement variability, which could not be excluded with a smaller VT increase on ECMO.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Pp Responsementioning
confidence: 99%