2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16173212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Leadership Enhance Patient Satisfaction? Assessing the Role of Administrative and Medical Quality

Abstract: This paper aimed to investigate the relationships between participative leadership (PL), administrative quality (AQ), medical quality (MQ), and patient satisfaction (PS) using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Healthcare Criteria (MBNQA) criteria. The study further examined the intervening influence of administrative quality and medical quality on the relationship between participative leadership and patient satisfaction. The data was obtained from 123 public sector hospitals in Pakistan. We employed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the average variance extracted (AVE) values for all of the constructs exceeded the recommended value of 0.50 [97,99], suggesting a high level of convergent validity. Lastly, the values of the square root of AVE for each construct were greater than the values of the inter-correlation between a pair of constructs, indicating discriminant validity [100].…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, the average variance extracted (AVE) values for all of the constructs exceeded the recommended value of 0.50 [97,99], suggesting a high level of convergent validity. Lastly, the values of the square root of AVE for each construct were greater than the values of the inter-correlation between a pair of constructs, indicating discriminant validity [100].…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The measurement model provided an acceptable fit [116] to the data (Table 4). For the individual measurement items, the factor loadings should be higher than 0.70 [117], demonstrating convergent validity. The values of the AVE for all of constructs were greater than the recommended value of 0.5 [118,119], which also indicates that the convergent validity was well established.…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas being neutral ground is conducive to making a place easily accessible and acting as a leveler makes way for people from diverse backgrounds to gather, the lively and interesting conversation is the main activity. Table 10 shows that the Composite Reliability (CR) of four factors is 0.913 to 0.764, which is above the standardize ratio CR ≥ 0.7 [96]. The values of average variance extracted (AVE) for all loaded variables are 0.679 to 0.523, which show "convergent validity" as it should be more than 0.50 that is often used as the threshold [97,98].…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%