Can Leader–Member Exchange Contribute to Safety Performance in An Italian Warehouse?

Abstract

Introduction: The research considers safety climate in a warehouse and wants to analyze the Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) role in respect to safety performance. Griffin and Neal’s safety model was adopted and Leader-Member Exchange was inserted as moderator in the relationships between safety climate and proximal antecedents (motivation and knowledge) of safety performance constructs (compliance and participation).Materials and Methods: Survey data were collected from a sample of 133 full-time employees in an Italian warehouse. The statistical framework of Hayes (2013) was adopted for moderated mediation analysis.Results: Proximal antecedents partially mediated the relationship between Safety climate and safety participation, but not safety compliance. Moreover, the results from the moderation analysis showed that the Leader–Member Exchange moderated the influence of safety climate on proximal antecedents and the mediation exist only at the higher level of LMX.Conclusion: The study shows that the different aspects of leadership processes interact in explaining individual proficiency in safety practices.Practical Implications: Organizations as warehouses should improve the quality of the relationship between a leader and a subordinate based upon the dimensions of respect, trust, and obligation for high level of safety performance.

The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Employee Retention: Mediation and Moderation Through Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Communication

“…Past research has examined employees' behavior predicted by several factors, such as the creation of a positive organizational climate to stimulate safe work behavior in employees (Smith-Crowe et al, 2003). Employees' behavior, including OCB, was positively affected by the ethical climate through the social identity approach (Pagliaro et al, 2018).…”

Prosocial and proactive “safety citizenship behaviour” (SCB): The mediating role of affective commitment and psychological ownership

“…Two important antecedents at a more distal level include supervisor safety climate at the team level and organizational support for safety participation at the higher company level. On the one hand, a supervisor safety climate is considered essential by scholars (Zohar, 2008) to communicate the priority of safety management instances and values in the daily working activities in the organization at the shop floor level (Mariani, Curcuruto, Matic, Sciacovelli, & Toderi, 2017). On the other hand, organizational support for safety participation concerns the degree whereby companies set up effective managerial systems and practices which sustain open safety communication between the workforce and their organizations (Tucker et al, 2008).…”

Safety-Specific Transformational Leadership, Safety Management Practices And Safety Motivation In Petroleum Industry

“…Hofmann and Morgeson (1999) established link between leader-member exchange (LMX) and perceived organizational support (POS) with safety-related outcomes: safety communication, safety commitment and accidents, which concluded that LMX was significantly related with safety communication, safety commitment and accidents. LMX theory has widely been adopted to gain an insight on the job performance, work commitment, safety behavior, job satisfaction and turnover intentions (Mariani et al, 2017). Leader-member exchange (LMX) was explored to describe the quality of relationship between subordinates and leaders in the organizations.…”