2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.103517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can late dark energy transitions raise the Hubble constant?

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
113
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to realize that the derivative is very different for CMB and BAO due to the vast difference in redshifts at which the standard ruler is observed, z ⋆ ≈ 1100 for CMB vs. z obs~1 for BAO, resulting in different values of the integral in Eq. (7). This results in different slopes of the respective r d (h) lines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to realize that the derivative is very different for CMB and BAO due to the vast difference in redshifts at which the standard ruler is observed, z ⋆ ≈ 1100 for CMB vs. z obs~1 for BAO, resulting in different values of the integral in Eq. (7). This results in different slopes of the respective r d (h) lines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Late time modifications based on simple phenomenological parameterizations tend to fall short of fully resolving the tension 7 . This is largely because the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and and supernovae (SN) data, probing the expansion in the 0 ≲ z ≲ 1 range, are generally consistent with a constant dark energy density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, increasing the number of species increases the contribution of these species in the calculation of background evolution, thus increasing the value of the expansion rate. Despite the efforts spent to cover the shortcomings of the standard model by including new factors, the current conclusion is that such tension cannot be dealt within reasonable physics beyond the standard cosmological model since any resolution of this disagreement produces even greater tensions with other parameters of the model such as Ω m and σ 8 [30,31,32,33,160,161].…”
Section: Cosmography In General Relativity and In Extended Theories Of Gravitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are many attempts to alleviate the issue in the literature (see for an incomplete list of works Refs. [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 ] and the recent overview in [ 79 , 80 ]). It has been recently discussed [ 81 , 82 ] that a transition in absolute magnitude for SnIa can also explain the apparent tension between the local and CMB measurements of the Hubble parameter .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%