Abstract:Background Rotational kinematics has become an important consideration after ACL reconstruction because of its possible influence on knee degeneration. However, it remains unknown whether ACL reconstruction can restore both rotational kinematics and normal joint contact patterns, especially during functional activities. Questions/purposes We asked whether knee kinematics (tibial anterior translation and axial rotation) and joint contact mechanics (tibiofemoral sliding distance) would be restored by double-bund… Show more
“…[98] Dual fluoroscopy and dynamic stereo-radiography is becoming more widely accessible because it provides better precision and more reliability than the use of high-speed cameras or marker based motion capture systems. [98] Hoshino and colleagues[99] investigated whether knee kinematics and joint contact mechanics can be restored after ACLR with a double-bundle or single-bundle graft using dynamic stereo x-ray to capture biplane radiographic images. The athletes were on average a little more than one year out from ACLR and were performing downhill treadmill running.…”
Section: Functional Recovery Of the Kneementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The athletes were on average a little more than one year out from ACLR and were performing downhill treadmill running. [99] The study concluded that neither ACLR procedure restored normal knee kinematics or medial joint sliding. [99] In addition, developments in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have allowed researchers to evaluate the composition and structures within the knee.…”
Section: Functional Recovery Of the Kneementioning
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common knee injuries sustained by athletes during sports participation. A devastating complication of returning to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a second ACL injury. Strong evidence now indicates that younger, more active athletes are at particularly high risk for a second ACL injury and this risk is greatest within the first two years following ACLR. Nearly one-third of the younger cohort that resumes sports participation will sustain a second ACL injury within the first two years after ACLR. The evidence indicates that the risk of second injury may abate over this time period. The incidence rate of second injuries in the first year after ACLR is significantly greater than the rate in the second year. The lower relative risk in the second year may be related to athletes achieving baseline joint health and function well after the current expected timeline (6 to 12 months) to be released to unrestricted activity. This highlights a considerable debate in the return to sport decision process as to whether an athlete should wait until two years after ACLR to return to unrestricted, sports activity. In this review, we present evidence in the literature that athletes achieve baseline joint health and function approximately two years after ACLR. We postulate that delay in returning to sports for nearly two years will significantly reduce the incidence of second ACL injuries.
“…[98] Dual fluoroscopy and dynamic stereo-radiography is becoming more widely accessible because it provides better precision and more reliability than the use of high-speed cameras or marker based motion capture systems. [98] Hoshino and colleagues[99] investigated whether knee kinematics and joint contact mechanics can be restored after ACLR with a double-bundle or single-bundle graft using dynamic stereo x-ray to capture biplane radiographic images. The athletes were on average a little more than one year out from ACLR and were performing downhill treadmill running.…”
Section: Functional Recovery Of the Kneementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The athletes were on average a little more than one year out from ACLR and were performing downhill treadmill running. [99] The study concluded that neither ACLR procedure restored normal knee kinematics or medial joint sliding. [99] In addition, developments in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have allowed researchers to evaluate the composition and structures within the knee.…”
Section: Functional Recovery Of the Kneementioning
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common knee injuries sustained by athletes during sports participation. A devastating complication of returning to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a second ACL injury. Strong evidence now indicates that younger, more active athletes are at particularly high risk for a second ACL injury and this risk is greatest within the first two years following ACLR. Nearly one-third of the younger cohort that resumes sports participation will sustain a second ACL injury within the first two years after ACLR. The evidence indicates that the risk of second injury may abate over this time period. The incidence rate of second injuries in the first year after ACLR is significantly greater than the rate in the second year. The lower relative risk in the second year may be related to athletes achieving baseline joint health and function well after the current expected timeline (6 to 12 months) to be released to unrestricted activity. This highlights a considerable debate in the return to sport decision process as to whether an athlete should wait until two years after ACLR to return to unrestricted, sports activity. In this review, we present evidence in the literature that athletes achieve baseline joint health and function approximately two years after ACLR. We postulate that delay in returning to sports for nearly two years will significantly reduce the incidence of second ACL injuries.
“…Women are at increased risk (up to 10-fold) for ACL injury in comparison to men when playing the same sport [29]. Despite reasonable success of ACL reconstruction, the current gold standard of treatment, in restoring the gross stability of the ACL-deficient knee, it fails to restore normal joint kinematics and kinetics [8,22,24,25,43,52]. Moreover, ACL reconstruction is associated with reduced activity level [5], an increased rate of secondary injury [48], and high risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA), up to 74%, even with advanced anatomic reconstruction techniques [13,32,33,40,50,56].…”
The current findings highlight the critical role of sex on the biomechanical outcomes of bridge-enhanced ACL repair in a relevant large animal model. Better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for these observations using preclinical models and concomitant clinical studies in human patients may allow for additional development of sex-specific surgical and rehabilitative strategies with potentially improved outcomes in women.
“…Nonetheless, the mechanical environment of the knee after an ACL injury and reconstruction is not well understood. While altered knee contact kinematics are known to exist after ACL injuries 3,8,16,28 and can persist after reconstruction, 1,10,23 joint contact forces in the ACL-injured knee are less well described. Joint contact force is the magnitude of load that is applied perpendicular to the articular surface and represents the compressive loading of the joint as a whole.…”
Background
After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, contact forces are decreased in the injured knee when compared with the uninjured knee. The persistence of contact force asymmetries after ACL reconstruction may increase the risk of reinjury and may play an important role in the development of knee osteoarthritis in these patients. Functional performance may also be useful in identifying patients who demonstrate potentially harmful joint contact force asymmetries after ACL reconstruction.
Hypothesis
Knee joint contact force asymmetries would be present during gait after ACL reconstruction, and performance on a specific set of validated return-to-sport (RTS) readiness criteria would discriminate between those who demonstrated contact force asymmetries and those who did not.
Study Design
Descriptive laboratory study.
Methods
A total of 29 patients with ACL ruptures participated in gait analysis and RTS readiness testing 6 months after reconstruction. Muscle and joint contact forces were estimated using an electromyography (EMG)–driven musculoskeletal model of the knee. The magnitude of typical limb asymmetry in uninjured controls was used to define limits of meaningful limb asymmetry in patients after ACL reconstruction. The RTS testing included isometric quadriceps strength testing, 4 unilateral hop tests, and 2 self-report questionnaires. Paired t tests were used to assess limb symmetry for peak medial and tibiofemoral contact forces in all patients, and a mixed-design analysis of variance was used to analyze the effect of passing or failing RTS testing on contact force asymmetry.
Results
Among all patients, neither statistically significant nor meaningful contact force asymmetries were identified. However, patients who failed RTS testing exhibited meaningful contact force asymmetries, with tibiofemoral contact force being significantly lower for the involved knee. Conversely, patients who passed RTS testing exhibited neither significant nor meaningful contact force asymmetries.
Conclusion
Joint contact force asymmetries during gait are present in some patients 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Patients who demonstrated poor functional performance on RTS readiness testing exhibited significant and meaningful contact force asymmetries.
Clinical Relevance
When assessing all patients together, variability in the functional status obscured significant and meaningful differences in contact force asymmetry in patients 6 months after ACL reconstruction. These specific RTS readiness criteria appear to differentiate between those who demonstrate joint contact force symmetry after ACL reconstruction and those who do not.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.