2003
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can ion-neutral damping help to form spicules?

Abstract: Abstract. The possible mechanism of generation of spicules by Alfvénic waves is studied in dissipative MHD where dissipation is mainly caused by ion-neutral collision damping, as suggested by Haerendel (1992). Ion-neutral damping becomes non-negligible at the high cyclic frequencies involved, typically greater than 0.1 Hz, and the potential role played by this effect in both forming and supporting solar spicules is investigated. The propagation of high frequency Alfvén waves on vertically open solar magnetic f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In James et al (2003) on the numerical simulation of Alfvén waves generating and supporting spicules, the authors compute maximum spicule heights for different magnetic fields in the corona, and for several different wave periods from 2 to 10 s. Our inferred field strengths hardly allow coronal field strengths that reach a 20 G value, which seems right at the limit of what those authors would need to reproduce spicule heights. On the other hand, the spicule heights that they compute for 10 G coronal fields, which seems a more appropriate value for the range of field strengths in spicules that we inferred, appear to be too low compared to observed spicular heights.…”
Section: Application To the Observed Datamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In James et al (2003) on the numerical simulation of Alfvén waves generating and supporting spicules, the authors compute maximum spicule heights for different magnetic fields in the corona, and for several different wave periods from 2 to 10 s. Our inferred field strengths hardly allow coronal field strengths that reach a 20 G value, which seems right at the limit of what those authors would need to reproduce spicule heights. On the other hand, the spicule heights that they compute for 10 G coronal fields, which seems a more appropriate value for the range of field strengths in spicules that we inferred, appear to be too low compared to observed spicular heights.…”
Section: Application To the Observed Datamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Previous work on the generation and propagation of Alfvén waves has included the simulation of high frequency waves generated by photospheric motions and the damping of these waves in the partially ionised chromosphere above. This damping was suggested as an explanation of the formation of spicules (DePontieu & Haerendel 1998;DePontieu 1999;James et al 2003). Spicules are high, thin jet like structures consisting of chromospheric plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Incorporating gravity and a magnetic flux tube that expands as a function of height, such that rB z ≈constant, where r is the flux tube radius, leads to increased torsional velocities as an Alfvén wave propagates forwards (Hollweg 1992;James et al 2003;. These additions to the model will only serve to further increase the amplitude of the torsional motions seen, and possibly strengthen the effects of the Alfvénic instability along the shocktube.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, non-thermal broadenings have been observed within the chromosphere (Beckers 1968(Beckers , 1972Pishkalo 1994;Jess et al 2009Jess et al , 2015. These non-thermal broadenings are usually interpreted as Alfvén waves and have been considered as a possible mechanism responsible for Type-I spicule formation (Hollweg et al 1982;Sterling & Hollweg 1988;Hollweg 1992;Kudoh & Shibata 1999;James et al 2003; though it is possible that other mechanisms such as leakage of p-mode oscillations along inclined field lines are responsible (De Pontieu et al 2004). For a review, see Sterling (2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation