2007
DOI: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v13i1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can involuntarily admitted patients give informed consent to participation in research?

Abstract: Researchers in psychiatry, sponsors of psychiatric research and research ethics committees are confronted with an ethical question, viz. whether patients admitted involuntarily to a psychiatric hospital can give informed consent to participate in research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants gave written informed consent after they had been clinically assessed as being capable of doing so [28,29]. Patients who were not capable of consenting were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants gave written informed consent after they had been clinically assessed as being capable of doing so [28,29]. Patients who were not capable of consenting were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research suggests that a functional approach to consent is ethically better than a categorical approach (Kallert et al 2008;Van Staden 2007). Recent research suggests that a functional approach to consent is ethically better than a categorical approach (Kallert et al 2008;Van Staden 2007).…”
Section: Ethical Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decisional capacity of people with severe mental illness has been the focus of much debate. Recent research suggests that a functional approach to consent is ethically better than a categorical approach (Kallert et al 2008;Van Staden 2007). In a functional approach, a patient's capacity to give informed consent is not assumed on the basis of their inclusion in a legal category, but on three criteria: (i) understanding the research proposal; (ii) choosing decisively for or against participation; and (iii) communicating their choice (Van Staden 2007).…”
Section: Ethical Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only research which relates to their mental illness (so-called 'therapeutic' research) is permitted, unless the permission of the Minister of Health is obtained. In each instance the capacity of the mentally ill child or adolescent to give informed consent must be clinically assessed and evaluated on a case-by-case-basis, which supports van Staden's view of a 'functional' approach [27] to consent.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each case, it must be clinically assessed whether the child or adolescent has the capacity: (i) to understand to what he or she is consenting; (ii) to ARTICLE choose decisively for or against participation in research; (iii) to communicate his or her choice; and (iv) to accept the need for an intervention. [27,28] Mentally ill children and adolescents may have difficulties in relation to each of the above. For example, any of the developmental disorders -such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorders or intellectual disability -may impair cognitive and decision-making skills.…”
Section: Subsection 71(2)mentioning
confidence: 99%