2018
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can intra-radicular cleaning protocols increase the retention of fiberglass posts? A systematic review

Abstract: The presence of residues within the root canal after post-space preparation can influence the bond strength between resin cement and root dentin when using fiberglass posts (FGPs). Currently, there is no consensus in the literature regarding what is the best solution for the removal of debris after post-space preparation. This systematic review involved "in vitro" studies to investigate if cleaning methods of the root canal after post-space preparation can increase the retention of FGPs evaluated by the push-o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have compared the two post systems with respect to their ability to reduce the risk of root fracture and have described the best techniques and protocols for use of posts, including post length and diameter and adhesive system. These studies have used different methods, such as application of oblique load and cyclic load, but all results converge positively to the same conclusion: the use of glass-fiber posts reduces the risk of root fracture, thus increasing the success of restoration 5,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14] . However, many professionals who advocate the use of cast metal posts and cores raise the question of how copings for metal-ceramic crowns cemented to glass-fiber posts rebased with composite resin would behave under tensile stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Several studies have compared the two post systems with respect to their ability to reduce the risk of root fracture and have described the best techniques and protocols for use of posts, including post length and diameter and adhesive system. These studies have used different methods, such as application of oblique load and cyclic load, but all results converge positively to the same conclusion: the use of glass-fiber posts reduces the risk of root fracture, thus increasing the success of restoration 5,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14] . However, many professionals who advocate the use of cast metal posts and cores raise the question of how copings for metal-ceramic crowns cemented to glass-fiber posts rebased with composite resin would behave under tensile stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Considering that for the installation of fiber posts is necessary to remove the smear layer present in the dentin wall due to possible interferences in adhesive strategies (15), it is interesting to compare the effect of the methods and moments of PSP on the amount of residual material in different root dentin depths. In the present study, the methods and the moments of PSP exerted influence on the amount of residues in the middle and apical thirds, which is probably related to anatomical characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hermetic apical seal is necessary to avoid endodontic treatment failure as a result of reinfection. Another important point is related to the amount of filling material residues after PSP, which may negatively affect the bond strength between the dentin and adhesive systems used for post cementation (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have evaluated the effect of dentin surface treatment on bond strength after cementation of intraradicular post, as the presence of smear layer and debris along the prepared root canal walls can also affect dentin adhesion 12 . Irrigating solution, such as EDTA 17%, used in this study before the cementation of the post, has its use consolidated in the literature, because it removes smear layer, but does not totally demineralize dentin, allowing the interaction of dentin inorganic substances with resin cement 13 , because the chemical characteristics of cement also influence the bond strength, the presence of the smear layer can be overcome by the possible chemical bond between dentin and the cement itself, which, in the case of U200 cement, is ensured by presence of trimellitic 4-methacry-loxythyl acidic monomers and phosphoric acid ether 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%