Can Intersectionality Help with Understanding and Tackling Health Inequalities? Perspectives of Professional Stakeholders

Abstract

Background: The concept of ‘intersectionality’ is increasingly employed within public health arenas, particularly in North America, and is often heralded as offering great potential to advance health inequalities research and action. Given persistently poor progress towards tackling health inequalities, and recent calls to reframe this agenda in the UK and Europe, the possible contribution of intersectionality deserves attention. Yet, no existing research has examined professional stakeholder understandings and perspectives on applying intersectionality to this field. In this paper we seek to address that gap. Methods: drawing upon a consultation survey and workshop undertaken in the UK. The survey included both researchers (n=53) and practitioners (n=20) with varied roles and levels of engagement in research and evaluation. Topics included: familiarity with the term and concept ‘intersectionality’, relevance to health inequalities work, and issues shaping its uptake. Respondents were also asked to comment on two specific policy suggestions; targeting and tailoring interventions to intersectional sub-groups, and evaluating the intersectional effects of policies. 23 people attended the face-to-face workshop. The aims of the workshop were to: share examples of applying intersectionality within health inequalities research and practice; understand the views of research and practice colleagues on potential contributions and challenges; and identify potential ways to promote intersectional approachesResults: Findings indicated a generally positive response to the concept and a cautiously optimistic assessment that intersectional approaches could be valuable. However, opinions were mixed and various challenges were raised, especially around whether intersectionality research is necessarily critical and transformative and, accordingly, how it should be operationalised methodologically. Nonetheless, there was general agreement that intersectionality is concerned with diverse inequalities and the systems of power that shape them.Conclusions: In the UK health inequalities policy and practice context there are a number of potential ways forward for intersectionality in helping to understand and tackle such inequalities.

Prognostication in inflammatory bowel disease

“…These include age of onset for both diseases (4,5), disease duration (6)(7)(8), disease extent and phenotype (9)(10)(11), extraintestinal manifestations (12), and concomitant immune mediated inflammatory disorders (13). Race, ethnicity, and sex have also been associated with differences in outcomes (14,15), likely entangled with their complex intersectionality with social determinants of health (16). Additionally, cigarette smoking has long been known to be associated with complications and need for therapy escalation in CD (11).…”

Health equity knowledge development: A conversation with Black nurse researchers

“…Critical reflection on how epistemologies can be racialized and gendered in the service of colonial capitalism counters the dominant Eurocentric epistemologies. This is accomplished by using intersectional epistemologies to imagine how race, ethnicity, gender, class, and sexuality are braided together by shared cultural knowledge, practices, spirituality, and education (Agénor, 2020; Holman et al, 2021). An intersectional braiding approach is designed to affirm linguistically based cultural knowledge.…”