2019
DOI: 10.1108/s0731-905320190000039001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Internet Match High-quality Traditional Surveys? Comparing the Health and Retirement Study and its Online Version

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study sample, 4.4% of the respondents were provided with an Internet-connected tablet at the time of recruitment in order to address the "digital divide" between different population groups (S1 Table). A comparison of UAS data with data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) shows that UAS lines up well with the CPS on a number of common variables, and matches the quality of the HRS, a traditional survey considered as the gold standard in social research [24,25]. Additional details about UAS are provided in S1 Appendix.…”
Section: Understanding America Study (Uas)mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study sample, 4.4% of the respondents were provided with an Internet-connected tablet at the time of recruitment in order to address the "digital divide" between different population groups (S1 Table). A comparison of UAS data with data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) shows that UAS lines up well with the CPS on a number of common variables, and matches the quality of the HRS, a traditional survey considered as the gold standard in social research [24,25]. Additional details about UAS are provided in S1 Appendix.…”
Section: Understanding America Study (Uas)mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The model specifications also included time fixed effects (in days) to capture the influence of aggregate effects, such as public announcements at the federal level or national news, that are shared among UAS respondents on a given day. Our analysis used post-stratification weights, generated through a raking algorithm, to align the sample to the US adult population in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, age, education and geographic location (see https://uasdata.usc.edu/page/ Weights and [24]). Analysis was performed with StataSE 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that even with relatively low response rates probabilitybased Internet panels provide superior information to convenience panels [19,20]. A comparison of UAS data with Current Population Survey (CPS) and Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data [21] shows that UAS data line up quite well with the CPS on a number of common variables, and there is no clear evidence that UAS compares less favorably to the CPS than the HRS, which is traditionally considered as a gold standard in social research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of UAS data with data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) shows that UAS lines up well with the CPS on a number of common variables, and matches the quality of the HRS, a traditional survey considered as the gold standard in social research. [19,20] See Online Appendix 1 for more details on UAS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model specifications also included time fixed effects (in days) to capture the influence of aggregate effects, such as public announcements at the federal level or national news, that are shared among UAS respondents on a given day. Our analysis used post-stratification weights, generated through a raking algorithm, to align the sample to the US adult population in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, age, education and geographic location (see https://uasdata.usc.edu/page/Weights and Angrisani et al [19] ). Analysis was performed with StataSE 14.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%