1994
DOI: 10.1016/0166-8641(94)90040-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can ideals without ccc be interesting?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same result can be obtained using [2], [7] and the prior properties of microscopic sets ([4, Proposition 20.14]).…”
Section: The Aim Of This Paper Is To Prove That the Pair (M M) Does supporting
confidence: 64%
“…The same result can be obtained using [2], [7] and the prior properties of microscopic sets ([4, Proposition 20.14]).…”
Section: The Aim Of This Paper Is To Prove That the Pair (M M) Does supporting
confidence: 64%
“…By removing the requirement about Borel hulls from the above definition, we would obtain the notions of perfectly κ-small sets studied by Zakrzewski in [19] in the context of ccc σ-ideals. The particular case of Haar-1 sets has been investigated by Balcerzak in [1], where he introduced the so-called property (D) of an invariant σ-ideal I, which says that there is a σ-compact Haar-1 set not belonging to I. Moreover, Banakh, Lyaskovska and Repovš in [4] considered packing index of a set, which is closely connected to Haar-1 sets (namely, a Borel set is Haar-1 if and only if its packing index is uncountable).…”
Section: Clearlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other σ‐ideals with property (M): ideals on Polish spaces with a \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}$\Sigma ^0_2$\end{document} base which are not ccc (see 12), some ideals defined by translations (see 2 and 13). For the further discussion on property (M) see 1, 2 and 4.…”
Section: Fubini Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%