2000
DOI: 10.1190/1.1438516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CanP-wave AVO be quantitative?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is still controversy about the contribution of gas hydrates at the base of the gas-hydrate stability zone to the observed negative impedance contrast at the BSR (Collett 2001). The accuracy of quantitative results from AVO analysis has not yet been proved (Cambois 2000), and widely used empirical relationships for the elastic moduli of rocks (e.g . Hamilton 1979) are often inappropriate for quantitative studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still controversy about the contribution of gas hydrates at the base of the gas-hydrate stability zone to the observed negative impedance contrast at the BSR (Collett 2001). The accuracy of quantitative results from AVO analysis has not yet been proved (Cambois 2000), and widely used empirical relationships for the elastic moduli of rocks (e.g . Hamilton 1979) are often inappropriate for quantitative studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hendrickson (1999) notices that AVO crossplot from Auger Field and the crossplot from random noise share similar features, which indicate that the observed background AVO trend can be just noise. Cambois (2000) further finds that noise in the P-wave seismic data may change the form of wavelet variation with offset and bias the estimation of rock properties. Simm et al (2000) find that random noise can be a significant component of noise on AVO crossplots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in amplitude variation with offset (AVO) technology have demonstrated that the measurement of conversion of compressional energy to shear energy at interfaces can yield significant information about the fluids and lithology present. Many theoretical, numerical and real data studies carried out during last three decades have witnessed the success of AVO technique (Castagna et al, 1998, Pramanik et al, 2000, Cambois, 2000, Goodway, 2001, Roden et al, 2005. The primary attributes extracted from AVO analysis are the intercepts and the gradients which are obtained from NMO corrected pre-stack amplitudes of conventional P-wave seismic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%