Can I help you? Information sharing in online discussion forums by people living with a long-term condition

Abstract

AbstrACtbackground Peer-to-peer health care is increasing, especially amongst people living with a long-term condition. How information is shared is, however, sometimes of concern to health care professionals. Objective This study explored what information is being shared on health-related discussion boards and identified the approaches people used to signpost their peers to information. Methods This study was conducted using a qualitative content analysis methodology to explore information shared on discussion boards for people living with diabetes. Whilst there is debate about the best ethical lens to view research carried out on data posted on online discussion boards, the researchers chose to adopt the stance of treating this type of information as "personal health text", a specific type of research data in its own right. results Qualitative content analysis and basic descriptive statistics were used to analyse the selected posts. Two major themes were identified: 'Information Sharing from Experience' and 'Signposting Other Sources of Information'. Conclusions People were actively engaging in information sharing in online discussion forums, mainly through direct signposting. The quality of the information shared was important, with reasons for recommendations being given. Much of the information sharing was based on experience, which also brought in information from external sources such as health care professionals and other acknowledged experts in the field.With the rise in peer-to-peer support networks, the nature of health knowledge and expertise needs to be redefined. People online are combining external information with their own personal experiences and sharing that for others to take and develop as they wish.

What people share about the COVID-19 outbreak on Twitter? An exploratory analysis

“…32 33 Also the users did not share the link from the authorised website and sources directly on social media. 34 Hence, it is vital to check the credibility of the messages to handle the situation efficiently. Studies say that unverified content and rumours were shared mostly by individual accounts when compared with other sources like non-governmental organisations, media and healthcare accounts.…”

Twenty percent better with 20 micrograms? A qualitative study of psychedelic microdosing self-rapports and discussions on YouTube

“…The sample appeared to be relatively diverse (prior knowledge, drug experience, age, gender, motives), but one commonality was a willingness to take on responsibility for personal health and development, either by a general lifestyle outlook or sheer desperation from not finding prescribed treatments and available healthcare sufficient. The social evolvement where people increasingly turn to health information and support groups on the internet and a lessening of the cultural authority of medical experts are noted and addressed in studies from various academic disciplines [e.g., [40–42]] our drug discussion studies [24] and prior microdosing studies [16]. Also, discontent with conventional therapies and adverse effects can incentivize the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) [43].…”

Accelerating Telemedicine for Cerebral Palsy During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

“…The conservative way of managing the patient is transforming as technology-enabled families are connected via social media and are better informed than in the past by available self-research. The internet and tele-communication era lead to shifting to a more mutually inclusive healthcare ( 43 , 44 ). Predictive, Personalized, Preventive, and Participatory (4P) medicine is advantageous with telemedicine tools ( 44 ).…”