2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-015-1322-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can groundwater secure drinking-water supply and supplementary irrigation in new settlements of North-West Cambodia?

Abstract: Since the end of the Cambodian Civil War in 1998, the population of the Oddar Meanchey province has drastically increased despite the lack of adequate infrastructure, including basic amenities such as drinking-water supply. To improve the access to drinking water, governmental and aid agencies have focussed on drilling shallow boreholes. The use of groundwater for irrigation is also a growing concern to cope with the occasional late arrival of the rainy season or to produce food during the dry season. Since th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of our results with previous studies undertaken in the LMB (Section 5.2) has highlighted an overall general agreement: absolute relative differences between these previous local assessments and our recharge rates in these locations are yielding an average of 32% excluding the two case studies in North and Southeast Cambodia where this percentage exceeds 100 [53,54]. These higher discrepancies likely result from two main factors: (i) the presence of local clay deposits in the surveyed sites; (ii) the sparse network of river gauging stations in Cambodia not monitoring these specific sites, thus not allowing our model to capture this sub-regional recharge constraint.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison of our results with previous studies undertaken in the LMB (Section 5.2) has highlighted an overall general agreement: absolute relative differences between these previous local assessments and our recharge rates in these locations are yielding an average of 32% excluding the two case studies in North and Southeast Cambodia where this percentage exceeds 100 [53,54]. These higher discrepancies likely result from two main factors: (i) the presence of local clay deposits in the surveyed sites; (ii) the sparse network of river gauging stations in Cambodia not monitoring these specific sites, thus not allowing our model to capture this sub-regional recharge constraint.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Broader-scale groundwater recharge assessments was performed over 15,000 km 2 in central Cambodia [52], yielding 448 mm/year from the SCS runoff curve method, aligned with Q B estim (464 mm/year) and slightly greater than Q B pred (278-357 mm/year) in this area. In Northwest Cambodia, groundwater recharge rates were estimated over 3375 km 2 of sandstones from Upper Triassic to Lower Cretaceous, using the water-table fluctuation method and the stable isotopes analysis from 12 piezometers [53]. Recharge rates of 10 to 70 mm/year, lower than our estimations in this area (200 mm/year), were explained by clayey soils overlying sandstone, whose presence can highly vary at the scale of few tens of meters.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant contrast between peat and the underlying mineral soil will likely occur due to the markedly different physical characteristics of organic versus inorganic sediments [53]. Electrical resistivity depends on the water and clay content [50,54], as well as the media consolidation degree (Table 1).…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When analyzing the relationship between δD and δ 18 O in different water bodies, most researchers have utilized either the Global Meteoric Water Line (GMWL) [6] or the Local Meteoric Water Line (LMWL), depending on the data collected by the Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation (GNIP) sites that are nearest to their study areas. However, the atmospheric water lines in different regions may vary due to differences in the many factors that affect the stable isotope fractionation from the water vapor source to raindrops [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%