2020
DOI: 10.1111/jifm.12116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can governance help in making an IPO “successful”? New evidence from Europe

Abstract: This paper investigates whether and how corporate governance can contribute to the likelihood of a "successful" IPO, by taking into account a representative sample of listings which have taken place in Europe from 2000 to 2015. Through a painstaking collection of data obtained from different sources, we compute the financial and stock performance achieved by a sample of 1,270 European companies, for which we investigate the association with several facets of firms' corporate governance (i.e., board

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such accessible collections of information can largely assist IPO parties in determining the fair market value of IPO shares, which reflects on the aftermarket price performance. This interpretation is in conjunction with a similar remark highlighted by previous studies showing a great asymmetric information gap between the primary and secondary markets (Shi et al 2013;Hong et al 2014;Brogi et al 2020). The absence of IFRS exerting an effect on aftermarket performance of IPO firms could lead to the idea that the quality of formal institutions is the main player in the long-term performance of these Saudi firms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such accessible collections of information can largely assist IPO parties in determining the fair market value of IPO shares, which reflects on the aftermarket price performance. This interpretation is in conjunction with a similar remark highlighted by previous studies showing a great asymmetric information gap between the primary and secondary markets (Shi et al 2013;Hong et al 2014;Brogi et al 2020). The absence of IFRS exerting an effect on aftermarket performance of IPO firms could lead to the idea that the quality of formal institutions is the main player in the long-term performance of these Saudi firms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This scenario is one where a change in the formal institutional quality is alone that has a positive effect on lowering IPO underpricing and improving the long-term performance of IPO firms (Jamaani & Ahmed 2021). This notion is built on the observations of the IPO underpricing and long-term performance literature, which argues that these two stock market phenomena can be affected by the existent of quality formal institutional environment (Zattoni et al 2017;Brogi et al 2020). This viewpoint suggests that asymmetry in the quality of formal institutions can influence the observed level of information asymmetry in the IPO market, therefore affecting the perceived level of IPO underpricing and long-term performance in that country.…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Corbetta and Salvato (2004), in a family-controlled firm, this ability is increased by family business experience and does not solely depend on a higher number of directors on the board (board size), on the presence of outsiders with different backgrounds (board composition) and on board activities (number of meetings, duration and frequency, as in other types of firms (Pfeffer, 1972;Hillman et al, 2000;Forbes and Milliken, 1999;Sonnenfeld, 2002). Third, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to apply a configurational approach to investigate board effectiveness in cash holding decisions and thus it is the first to overcome the "one-size-fits-all" prescriptions and move toward a "bundle" perspective (Brogi et al, 2020). Findings suggest that single governance mechanisms are not sufficient in reaching effectiveness in cash holding decisions.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This suggests that investors' decision to invest in a SPAC IPO during the socioeconomic malaise may be driven by recognition of the unique managerial capabilities and confidence in the SPAC's founder to succeed. 2 While studies on SPACs are sparse and most prior studies focused on the structural aspects (e.g., Cumming et al 2014;Kim et al 2020;Kolb and Tykvova 2016), an evolving literature stream considers IPO performance in relation to ownership structure (Boubaker et al 2020), governance quality (Brogi et al 2020), management earnings (Boubaker et al 2017), and aftermarket performance (Cao-Alvira and Rodríguez 2017). In response, a handful of studies analyse the performance of SPAC IPOs (e.g., Gahng et al 2021;Kiesel et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%