“…In short, the lack of detail on the reproduction rate, as well as other issues 6 have led to uncertainty in model outputs that attempt to distinguish between the relative roles of direct exploitation (Blockstein and Tordoff 1985) versus habitat destruction (Bucher 1992). While many now agree that both direct and indirect factors played some role in the demise of passenger pigeons (Blockstein 2002), most downplay the importance of habitat destruction, favouring instead to view the extinction process as one driven by the wanton actions of a self-interested commercial hunting and trapping industry that was supported by an ill-informed pubic (e.g., Hedrick 2018;Hume 2015;Hung, et al 2014;Hung, et al 2018;Kasperbauer 2017;Takahashi, et al 2018). Based on the evidence, however, there is yet no resolution on the relative importance of these two variables, and while it seems highly likely that both played important roles, new evidence could help us better understand what processes drove the species to extinction.…”