Abstract:Background: Organ supply–demand in developing countries worldwide has continued to widen. Hence, using a large survey (n ¼ 10,412), this study seeks to investigate whether human psychology could be used to inculcate philanthropy to raise deceased organ donation rates. Methods: Three models were constructed to examine multidimensional relationships among the variables. Structural equation modeling was applied to estimate the direct and indirect influence of altruism, financial incentives, donation perception, a… Show more
“…9 Alerts are received only after a user is exposed, at which point quarantine could prevent exposure of others but could not reverse the user's own exposure.Financial compensation for using an EN app has been shown to improve uptake 9-11 but is not feasible for large-scale deployment. 12,13 Privacy concerns are cited as major barriers to adoption of EN apps, 14 especially when they track a user's location (eg, using global positioning systems, Wi-Fi, QR code scanners, financial transaction data). 15,16 Some technologies avoid recording a person's geolocation by measuring only proximity between users (eg, Bluetooth signal strength 17,18 or inaudible…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financial compensation for using an EN app has been shown to improve uptake 9 - 11 but is not feasible for large-scale deployment. 12 , 13 …”
Health authorities encouraged the use of digital contact tracing mobile applications (apps) during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the level of adoption was low because apps offered few direct benefits to counterbalance risks to personal privacy. Adoption of such apps could improve if they provided benefits to users. NOVID (COVID-19 Radar), a smartphone app, provided users with personalized data on social proximity of COVID-19 cases and exposed contacts. We analyzed uptake of NOVID at the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) during the 2020-2021 academic year. Data included anonymous NOVID users who self-identified with Georgia Tech and their first- and second-degree network contacts. NOVID achieved 13%-30% adoption at Georgia Tech. Because of technical challenges, adoption waned after an initial peak. The largest increases in adoption (from 41 to 3704) followed administrative promotion of NOVID. Adoption increased modestly (from 2512 to 2661) after faculty- and student-led promotion, such as distribution of door hangers and a public seminar. Two-thirds of on-campus NOVID users were connected to a large network of other users, enabling them to receive data on social proximity of COVID-19 cases and exposed contacts. Network cohesion was observed to emerge rapidly when adoption rates passed just 10%, consistent with estimates from network theory. The key lesson learned in this case study is that top-down administrative promotion outperforms bottom-up grassroots promotion. Relatively high levels of adoption and network cohesion, despite technical challenges during the Georgia Tech pilot of NOVID, illustrate the promise of digital contact tracing when apps provide privacy and inherently beneficial personalized data to their users, especially in regions where Google Apple Exposure Notification is not available.
“…9 Alerts are received only after a user is exposed, at which point quarantine could prevent exposure of others but could not reverse the user's own exposure.Financial compensation for using an EN app has been shown to improve uptake 9-11 but is not feasible for large-scale deployment. 12,13 Privacy concerns are cited as major barriers to adoption of EN apps, 14 especially when they track a user's location (eg, using global positioning systems, Wi-Fi, QR code scanners, financial transaction data). 15,16 Some technologies avoid recording a person's geolocation by measuring only proximity between users (eg, Bluetooth signal strength 17,18 or inaudible…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financial compensation for using an EN app has been shown to improve uptake 9 - 11 but is not feasible for large-scale deployment. 12 , 13 …”
Health authorities encouraged the use of digital contact tracing mobile applications (apps) during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the level of adoption was low because apps offered few direct benefits to counterbalance risks to personal privacy. Adoption of such apps could improve if they provided benefits to users. NOVID (COVID-19 Radar), a smartphone app, provided users with personalized data on social proximity of COVID-19 cases and exposed contacts. We analyzed uptake of NOVID at the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) during the 2020-2021 academic year. Data included anonymous NOVID users who self-identified with Georgia Tech and their first- and second-degree network contacts. NOVID achieved 13%-30% adoption at Georgia Tech. Because of technical challenges, adoption waned after an initial peak. The largest increases in adoption (from 41 to 3704) followed administrative promotion of NOVID. Adoption increased modestly (from 2512 to 2661) after faculty- and student-led promotion, such as distribution of door hangers and a public seminar. Two-thirds of on-campus NOVID users were connected to a large network of other users, enabling them to receive data on social proximity of COVID-19 cases and exposed contacts. Network cohesion was observed to emerge rapidly when adoption rates passed just 10%, consistent with estimates from network theory. The key lesson learned in this case study is that top-down administrative promotion outperforms bottom-up grassroots promotion. Relatively high levels of adoption and network cohesion, despite technical challenges during the Georgia Tech pilot of NOVID, illustrate the promise of digital contact tracing when apps provide privacy and inherently beneficial personalized data to their users, especially in regions where Google Apple Exposure Notification is not available.
“…How to promote individual charitable giving is a quest in many disciplines, including business and social science (Sargeant & Woodliffe, 2007). People's prosocial behaviors, such as donating to charities, are driven by three primary motivations: (1) the intrinsic motivation, such as pure altruism or inequality aversion, as people care for others' well‐being (Andreoni, 1989; Caviola et al, 2021; Milaniak et al, 2018; Polonsky et al, 2002; Rasiah et al, 2020); (2) the extrinsic motivation, which refers to the material rewards received, such as gifts and financial incentives (Atiq & Tripathi, 2016; Bagheri et al, 2019; Bowie et al, 2022; Chang & Chen, 2019; Sargeant et al, 2006); and (3) the reputation motivation, which implies that people care about their social images perceived by others and themselves (Aknin & Whillans, 2021; Glazer & Konrad, 1996; Graça & Zwick, 2021; Holländer, 1990; Paramita et al, 2022; Sargeant & Jay, 2004; Septianto et al, 2021). A large volume of research examines these three motivations of charitable giving, as reviewed in the following section.…”
Previous studies discover confounding results on how donor recognition affects individual charitable giving. To answer the questions of how different donor recognition schemes affect individual giving and what type is more effective as a marketing strategy to meet different fundraising goals, we conducted a field experiment in China with three donor recognition types: voluntary, involuntary, and mandatory donor recognition. We used social media to recognize donors and verified the field experiment results with naturally occurring data. We observed similar behavioral patterns in both samples. The results of this study explain the mixed results from previous studies, suggesting that there is no one-size-fits-all approach for recognizing donors. Decision makers of nonprofit organizations need to select the appropriate type of donor recognition based on their fundraising goals.
“…In addition, there are models that group together the different types of incentives [15], which include base salary, performance, and career management; salary in the event of contingencies; and good working environment, perks, and work-life balance. These are designed according to the norms and cultures of each country [16], so it is easy to find specific features that differentiate them.…”
The purpose of this work is to analyse the preferences of Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) in relation to the different components of incentive systems: financial vs. non-financial. The incentive systems could be an instrument for the sustainable development of Firms. Upper Echelons Theory establishes that the traits of executives affect the decision-making processes, and among these traits, narcissism is a potentially influential factor in these processes. Therefore, the extent to which the level of narcissism influences the choice of one instrument or another is also analysed. For this purpose, a choice experiment has been carried out to analyse the preferences of CEOs. The questionnaire developed incorporates both the choices about different systems and the NPI-16 test that allows individuals to be classified according to their narcissistic nature. The main results show that, in general, there is a stronger preference for non-financial instruments than for financial instruments in the design of incentive systems. However, narcissistic CEOs show a clear inclination towards financial incentives that bring them benefits rather than provide incentives.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.