2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can EUS-guided FNA distinguish between gallbladder cancer and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it may be difficult to distinguish them. EUS-guided FNAC has been suggested preoperatively by Hijioka et al [17]. Based on presumptive imaging diagnosis of XGC along with the above peroperative findings, open cholecystectomy and frozen section was performed in 10 patients in our series thus avoiding mutilating radical surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Nevertheless, it may be difficult to distinguish them. EUS-guided FNAC has been suggested preoperatively by Hijioka et al [17]. Based on presumptive imaging diagnosis of XGC along with the above peroperative findings, open cholecystectomy and frozen section was performed in 10 patients in our series thus avoiding mutilating radical surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The accuracy of EUS-FNA for detecting malignancy and for the final diagnosis is approximately 93% and 80%, respectively [13, 14]. Sampling errors in the form of samples from nonrepresentative areas along with a confounding factor of coexistence of XGC and GBC limit the widespread applicability of EUS-FNA in XGC [13, 14]. Intraoperative frozen section examination is an efficient method for exclusion of GBC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA to correctly distinguish between benign and malignant masses in their study was 93.3 % with a sensitivity and specificity of 90 and 100 %, respectively. 1 Only one EUS-FNA result was a false negative because of insufficient sampling from unresectable GB carcinoma, and none of the results were false positive. In another study of 83 cases, diagnostic sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 96 % with no procedure-related complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To overcome the limitations of percutaneous FNA and, at the same time, in order to achieve tissue diagnosis, EUS-FNA has been increasingly used in suspicious cases to differentiate gall bladder cancer (GBC) from XGC. In a study of 51 cases of gall bladder masses by Hijioka et al, 1 they found that EUS findings of disrupted gall bladder mucosal lining and/or regional lymph nodes are highly suggestive of gall bladder cancer and uncommon in XGC. EUS-FNA of these gall bladder masses or regional lymph nodes is very useful in making definitive diagnosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%