2001
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.261606598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can engineered bacteria help control cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale behind this combined therapy (called combination bacteriolytic therapy, or COBALT) was that the anaerobic bacteria grew in the anaerobic zone within tumor cores; the anti-vascular agent would create more extensive hypoxic areas for bacterial growth, thereby depriving the tumors of oxygen and essential nutrients while the chemotherapeutic agent attacked and destroyed the remaining well-perfused tumor cells. 8 The results of this study were highly significant: in the absence of bacteria, but in the presence of mitomycin C and dolastatin -10, the tumors persisted for a much longer time and showed limited regression, while inclusion of bacteria led to extensive disappearance of the tumors within a short period of time and, in some cases, complete tumor dissolution that left the animal tumor-free. The major limitation of this study was its associated toxicity: 15-45% of the mice died within few days of beginning treatment, presumably due to the release of highly toxic metabolic products from the disintegrating tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The rationale behind this combined therapy (called combination bacteriolytic therapy, or COBALT) was that the anaerobic bacteria grew in the anaerobic zone within tumor cores; the anti-vascular agent would create more extensive hypoxic areas for bacterial growth, thereby depriving the tumors of oxygen and essential nutrients while the chemotherapeutic agent attacked and destroyed the remaining well-perfused tumor cells. 8 The results of this study were highly significant: in the absence of bacteria, but in the presence of mitomycin C and dolastatin -10, the tumors persisted for a much longer time and showed limited regression, while inclusion of bacteria led to extensive disappearance of the tumors within a short period of time and, in some cases, complete tumor dissolution that left the animal tumor-free. The major limitation of this study was its associated toxicity: 15-45% of the mice died within few days of beginning treatment, presumably due to the release of highly toxic metabolic products from the disintegrating tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Such microbe-host protein-carbohydrate interaction (Karlsson, 2001) is not only the essential step to produce infection, but also it leads to a status alternation of the host cells, for instance, the induction of apoptosis (Mulvey et al, 1998;Klumpp et al, 2006). Engineered bacteria are able to help control cancer (Jain and Forbes, 2001). PA-MSHA is a genetically established, engineered Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) strain characterized by the expression of mannosesensitive type 1 fimbriae on its surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides new options for amelioration of metabolic disorders, allergies or autoimmune diseases [2,[8][9][10] but also for delivery of anticancer drugs and detection of residual cancerous tissue [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%