Can EEG and MEG detect signals from the human cerebellum?

Abstract

The cerebellum plays a key role in the regulation of motor learning, coordination and timing, and has been implicated in sensory and cognitive processes as well. However, our current knowledge of its electrophysiological mechanisms comes primarily from direct recordings in animals, as investigations into cerebellar function in humans have instead predominantly relied on lesion, haemodynamic and metabolic imaging studies. While the latter provide fundamental insights into the contribution of the cerebellum to various cerebellar-cortical pathways mediating behaviour, they remain limited in terms of temporal and spectral resolution. In principle, this shortcoming could be overcome by monitoring the cerebellum’s electrophysiological signals. Non-invasive assessment of cerebellar electrophysiology in humans, however, is hampered by the limited spatial resolution of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in subcortical structures, i.e., deep sources. Furthermore, it has been argued that the anatomical configuration of the cerebellum leads to signal cancellation in MEG and EEG. Yet, claims that MEG and EEG are unable to detect cerebellar activity have been challenged by an increasing number of studies over the last decade. Here we address this controversy and survey reports in which electrophysiological signals were successfully recorded from the human cerebellum. We argue that the detection of cerebellum activity non-invasively with MEG and EEG is indeed possible and can be enhanced with appropriate methods, in particular using connectivity analysis in source space. We provide illustrative examples of cerebellar activity detected with MEG and EEG. Furthermore, we propose practical guidelines to optimize the detection of cerebellar activity with MEG and EEG. Finally, we discuss MEG and EEG signal contamination that may lead to localizing spurious sources in the cerebellum and suggest ways of handling such artefacts. This review is to be read as a perspective review that highlights that it is indeed possible to measure cerebellum with MEG and EEG and encourages MEG and EEG researchers to do so. Its added value beyond highlighting and encouraging is that it offers useful advice for researchers aspiring to investigate the cerebellum with MEG and EEG.

Clinical connectome fingerprints of cognitive decline

“…Another important caveat of this study is that, in MEG source-reconstructed data, the signal-to-noise ratio is heavily dependent on the depth distance between the source and the sensor, and hence is not homogeneous for all the sources. However, recent evidence showed that signals reconstructed from the basal ganglia contain reliable information about brain activity (31,32) as well as those from the cerebellum (33). On the one hand, MEG signals derived from the cerebellum are 30-to-60 % weaker as compared to the cortical surface (34).…”

Progress in Brain Computer Interface: Challenges and Opportunities

“…Sometimes technological limitations may hinder essential features extraction for a successful BCI operation for an individual. For example, measurements of scalp EEG/MEG may not show good task-specific signals due to the folding of the cortex or scalp-to-cortex distance for that individual (Andersen et al, 2020 ).…”

HD-EEG for tracking sub-second brain dynamics during cognitive tasks

“…Also, some studies reported the potential use of HD-EEG data (compared to low EEG channel density) in some pathological conditions such as the localization of epileptic networks 15 and the detection of cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases 16 . In addition, emerging evidence show the possibility, to some extent, to capture sub-cortical structures using HD-EEG 17 , 18 . In this context, the availability of task-free and task-related open-access HD-EEG databases is becoming mandatory to (i) decipher the fast (sub-seconds) reconfiguration of functional brain networks during cognition, (ii) develop new signal processing methods to adequately estimate cortical brain networks and (iii) allow the reproducibility of results obtained so far using HD-EEG.…”