2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can EDGES observation favour any dark matter model?

Abstract: The recent detection of the 21-cm absorption signal by the EDGES collaboration has been widely used to constrain the basic properties of dark matter particles. However, extracting the parameters of the 21-cm absorption signal relies on a chosen parametrisation of the foreground radio emission. Recently, the new parametrisations of the foreground and systematics have been proposed, showing significant deviations of the 21-cm signal parameters from those assumed by the original EDGES paper. In this paper, we con… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of free-streaming, quantum pressure effects, and/or dark-sector interaction, all these scenarios produce a matter power spectrum suppressed on small-scales, less (sub)structures, and flatter inner density profiles within halos relative to CDM [36,59,68,78,107,112,113,125]. Indirect astrophysical constraints on the properties of such nonstandard DM scenarios, and especially of thermal WDM relics, have been obtained by investigating the Lyman-α forest [60,61,124], high-redshift galaxy counts [87,116], cosmic reionization [32,74], integrated 21cm data [22,31,33,109], γ-ray emission [24,51], fossil records of the Local Group [126,127], and Milky-Way satellite galaxies [63,93,96].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of free-streaming, quantum pressure effects, and/or dark-sector interaction, all these scenarios produce a matter power spectrum suppressed on small-scales, less (sub)structures, and flatter inner density profiles within halos relative to CDM [36,59,68,78,107,112,113,125]. Indirect astrophysical constraints on the properties of such nonstandard DM scenarios, and especially of thermal WDM relics, have been obtained by investigating the Lyman-α forest [60,61,124], high-redshift galaxy counts [87,116], cosmic reionization [32,74], integrated 21cm data [22,31,33,109], γ-ray emission [24,51], fossil records of the Local Group [126,127], and Milky-Way satellite galaxies [63,93,96].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the 21 cm signal is very sensitive to uncertainties in the modelling of the Galactic foreground and in our understanding of the physics of star formation at early times. Therefore, the current data cannot constrain the properties of the DM [108][109][110]. Future studies of the statistics of the spatial distribution of the 21 cm signal and further work to understand stellar evolution at high redshift will overcome these difficulties [109,110].…”
Section: Jcap08(2021)062mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, the current data cannot constrain the properties of the DM [108][109][110]. Future studies of the statistics of the spatial distribution of the 21 cm signal and further work to understand stellar evolution at high redshift will overcome these difficulties [109,110].…”
Section: Jcap08(2021)062mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a consequence of free-streaming, quantum pressure effects, and/or darksector interaction, all these scenarios produce a matter power spectrum suppressed on small scales, fewer (sub)structures, and flatter inner density profiles within halos relative to CDM [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Indirect astrophysical constraints on the properties of such nonstandard DM scenarios have been obtained by investigating the Lyman-α forest [44][45][46][47], high-redshift galaxy counts [48][49][50][51], γ-ray bursts [52,53], cosmic reionization [54][55][56][57][58], gravitational lensing [59,60], integrated 21 cm data [61][62][63][64], γ-ray emission [65,66], fossil records of the Local Group [67,68], dwarf galaxy profiles and scaling relations [69,70], and Milky Way satellite galaxies [71][72][73][74][75] or a combination of these [76].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%