Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature

Abstract

BackgroundTelemedicine has been advocated as an effective means to provide health care services over a distance. Systematic information on costs and consequences has been called for to support decision-making in this field. This paper provides a review of the quality, validity and generalisability of economic evaluations in telemedicine.MethodsA systematic literature search in all relevant databases was conducted and forms the basis for addressing these issues. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals and written in English in the period from 1990 to 2007 were analysed. The literature search identified 33 economic evaluations where both costs (resource use) and outcomes (non-resource consequences) were measured.ResultsThis review shows that economic evaluations in telemedicine are highly diverse in terms of both the study context and the methods applied. The articles covered several medical specialities ranging from cardiology and dermatology to psychiatry. The studies analysed telemedicine in home care, and in primary and secondary care settings using a variety of different technologies including videoconferencing, still-images and monitoring (store-and-forward telemedicine). Most studies used multiple outcome measures and analysed the effects using disaggregated cost-consequence frameworks. Objectives, study design, and choice of comparators were mostly well reported. The majority of the studies lacked information on perspective and costing method, few used general statistics and sensitivity analysis to assess validity, and even fewer used marginal analysis.ConclusionAs this paper demonstrates, the majority of the economic evaluations reviewed were not in accordance with standard evaluation techniques. Further research is needed to explore the reasons for this and to address how economic evaluation in telemedicine best can take advantage of local constraints and at the same time produce valid and generalisable results.

A review of telephone coaching services for people with long-term conditions

“…23 These findings are echoed in a previous telemedicine reviews, which have criticised economic evaluations for failing to take into account important costs, neglecting associated indirect costs and not using standard economic evaluation techniques. 24,25 While evidence demonstrating CBA in telephone coaching is limited, a range of other positive outcomes were reported. These outcomes varied across the studies reviewed, although most reported physical benefits, mental health improvements, self-reported health perceptions and self-care regimen compliance.…”

Telemedicine: A Cost-Reducing Means of Delivering Psychotherapy to Rural Combat Veterans with PTSD

“…27,34 However, despite the common assumption that telemedicine is cost reducing, at this point the accumulation of data on cost lags well behind that of data supporting clinical efficacy. 28,35,36 There is currently a lack of coherent methodology for the cost evaluation of services delivered via telemedicine. Researchers have noted the need for studies that measure quantifiable clinical and cost outcomes, including measures of efficacy, efficiency, and opportunity cost, 37 when conducting studies to determine if the potential benefits outweigh the costs of providing services via telemedicine.…”

Telehealth in the developing world: current status and future prospects

“…Significant research has been performed, but more is required as the quality of research and value of the resulting solutions have been frequently questioned, particularly for economic studies. [7][8][9][10][11] However, the sheer volume and generally positive impact of the telehealth literature must hold some weight. The need for a "realistic review" to explain what works, for whom, and in what circumstances seems urgent.…”