2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can earthworms simultaneously enhance decomposition and stabilization of plant residue carbon?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study also indicated that the earthworm activity in soils had no effect on the cumulative CO 2 emissions for 32 days. A previous quantitative review reported that the earthworm presence increased soil CO 2 emissions by 33% on average, but the results also stated that the data from the short-term (< 30 days) studies were markedly variable [48,49]. Also, we did not observe clear differences in CO 2 emissions between samples with and without earthworms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The current study also indicated that the earthworm activity in soils had no effect on the cumulative CO 2 emissions for 32 days. A previous quantitative review reported that the earthworm presence increased soil CO 2 emissions by 33% on average, but the results also stated that the data from the short-term (< 30 days) studies were markedly variable [48,49]. Also, we did not observe clear differences in CO 2 emissions between samples with and without earthworms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Among these grasslands, especially semi-dry, nutrient-poor meadows represent particularly species-rich plant agroecosystems inhabiting many rare and protected plant and animal species (Bohner et al, 2003;Wilson et al, 2012). To protect these species-rich grasslands, regular extensive management is an important measure for nature conservation (Bohner et al, 2003;Lundber et al, 2017;Moog et al, 2002). However, socio-economic trends have led to a decline of traditional farming practices (Hejcman et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fraction) as some intrinsic variables of the soil for their respective formation, supported by the inverse correlations between this category of aggregates in edaphic properties such as the content of silts, SM, pH, EA, Al, CEC and K (Table 5). In different studies (Loss et al, 2014;Batista et al, 2013;Pulleman et al, 2005) the relationship between biogenic macroaggregates and elements contents in the soil has been observed, such as Ca, working as a cementing agent, situation not presented in this study (Table 5). However, in the case of Na, there was a relationship (r = 0.34; p-value < 0.05) with biogenic macroaggregates.…”
Section: Relationship and Covariation Between The Formation Of Aggregmentioning
confidence: 53%