2008
DOI: 10.1080/02732170802206203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Early Family Formation Explain the Lower Educational Attainment of U.S. Conservative Protestants?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding complicates research on the effects of religion on adolescent health and safety risk factors, which generally finds protective effects of religious involvement and conservative religious groups Hill et al 2009;Dew et al 2008;Manglos 2013;Adamczyk and Felson 2012;Adamczyk and Palmer 2008;Wallace and Forman 1998;Harker 2001;Borowsky, Ireland, and Resnick 2001;Regnerus 2003). This study also adds to a growing body of research showing the importance of religious subcultures for life chances and the unfavorable influence of conservative Protestantism and conservative religious beliefs for a number of outcomes, extending this literature to the arena of an important health and safety risk factor (Cline and Ferraro 2006;Darnell and Sherkat 1997;Fitzgerald and Glass 2008;Glass and Jacobs 2005;Keister 2008;Massengill 2008;Sherkat and Darnell 1999;Emerson and Smith 2000;Ellison, Burr, and Mccall 2003;Sherkat 2010Sherkat , 2012Stroope, Franzen, and Uecker 2015;Uecker 2014;Lehrer 1999). 16 Catholic and Mainline Protestant interactions with religious attendance were marginally significant (p<.10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This finding complicates research on the effects of religion on adolescent health and safety risk factors, which generally finds protective effects of religious involvement and conservative religious groups Hill et al 2009;Dew et al 2008;Manglos 2013;Adamczyk and Felson 2012;Adamczyk and Palmer 2008;Wallace and Forman 1998;Harker 2001;Borowsky, Ireland, and Resnick 2001;Regnerus 2003). This study also adds to a growing body of research showing the importance of religious subcultures for life chances and the unfavorable influence of conservative Protestantism and conservative religious beliefs for a number of outcomes, extending this literature to the arena of an important health and safety risk factor (Cline and Ferraro 2006;Darnell and Sherkat 1997;Fitzgerald and Glass 2008;Glass and Jacobs 2005;Keister 2008;Massengill 2008;Sherkat and Darnell 1999;Emerson and Smith 2000;Ellison, Burr, and Mccall 2003;Sherkat 2010Sherkat , 2012Stroope, Franzen, and Uecker 2015;Uecker 2014;Lehrer 1999). 16 Catholic and Mainline Protestant interactions with religious attendance were marginally significant (p<.10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…To the extent that mass education promotes democracy, CPs may have indirectly influenced democratization. 23 In fact, because theologically conservative Protestants tend both to marry and have children earlier than other people in the United States and to place greater value on mothers staying home with children, women from theologically conservative Protestant backgrounds tend to have less graduate education than other religious groups in the United States (Fitzgerald and Glass 2008).…”
Section: Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservative Protestants stand out for their tendency to avoid cohabitation and enter marriage and childbearing at a young age (Lehrer 2004b;Glass and Jacobs 2005;Uecker and Stokes 2008;Fitzgerald and Glass 2008); their low level of education (Darnell and Sherkat 1997;Sherkat and Darnell 1999;Lehrer 1999;2004c;Glass and Jacobs 2005); greater asymmetry in the intra-household division of labor (Ellison and Bartkowski 2002); low levels of employment when young children are present in the household (Lehrer 1995;Sherkat 2000;Glass and Nath 2006); relatively high fertility (Lehrer 1996;Hout, Greeley and Wilde 2001); and low levels of female wages (Lehrer 2005) and of family wealth (Keister 2003(Keister , 2005(Keister , 2009a(Keister , 2009b. At the same time, non-Orthodox Jews tend to display opposite patterns, including delayed entry to marriage (Lehrer 2004b), low fertility (Mosher and Hendershot 1984); high educational attainment (Chiswick 1988;Lehrer 1999); high level of female employment except when young children are present in the household (Chiswick 1986;Hartman and Hartman 1996); high wages (Chiswick 1988;Lehrer 2005) and high levels of wealth (Keister 2003(Keister , 2005(Keister , 2009a).…”
Section: Religion Human Capital Investments and The Family In The Unmentioning
confidence: 99%