Can dynamic occupancy models improve predictions of species' range dynamics? A test using Swiss birds

Abstract

Predictions of species' current and future ranges are needed to effectively manage species under environmental change. Species ranges are typically estimated using correlative species distribution models (SDMs), which have been criticized for their static nature. In contrast, dynamic occupancy models (DOMs) explicitily describe temporal changes in species’ occupancy via colonization and local extinction probabilities, estimated from time series of occurrence data. Yet, tests of whether these models improve predictive accuracy under current or future conditions are rare. Using a long‐term data set on 69 Swiss birds, we tested whether DOMs improve the predictions of distribution changes over time compared to SDMs. We evaluated the accuracy of spatial predictions and their ability to detect population trends. We also explored how predictions differed when we accounted for imperfect detection and parameterized models using calibration data sets of different time series lengths. All model types had high spatial predictive performance when assessed across all sites (mean AUC > 0.8), with flexible machine learning SDM algorithms outperforming parametric static and DOMs. However, none of the models performed well at identifying sites where range changes are likely to occur. In terms of estimating population trends, DOMs performed best, particularly for species with strong population changes and when fit with sufficient data, while static SDMs performed very poorly. Overall, our study highlights the importance of considering what aspects of performance matter most when selecting a modelling method for a particular application and the need for further research to improve model utility. While DOMs show promise for capturing range dynamics and inferring population trends when fitted with sufficient data, computational constraints on variable selection and model fitting can lead to reduced spatial accuracy of predictions, an area warranting more attention.

Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: learning from forest ecosystems

“…From this viewpoint, the measure of performance of an REE is not the amount of entrepreneurial activity or the value created (or destroyed) alone but the progressive, stable or possibly regressive change in structural-organisational complexity and social diversity. To explore this further, ecological studies of population change such as that by Berryman ( 1999 ) or Briscoe et al ( 2021 ) may be extremely useful to extract methods, ideas and clues about indicators, empirical methods and theories that can be related back to industries, firm populations and changes in populations of specific actors or entrepreneurs.…”

Spatially explicit models for decision‐making in animal conservation and restoration

“…Yet, dynamic modelling approaches typically need more data to inform the different biological processes being modelled (Fig. 4) (Urban et al 2016, Briscoe et al 2021) and also a solid a priori understanding of the system or extensive model testing to adequately capture the structural uncertainty, meaning defining the adequate model complexity (Zurell et al 2016). Thus, data availability and accessibility of methods remain key barriers that prevent more widespread use of dynamic modelling approaches (Briscoe et al 2019).…”

“…4). Further, model evaluations on simulated data as well as on empirical data have shown that predictive accuracy of dynamic models increases when fitted to longer time series, with more information content on transient dynamics (Pagel and Schurr 2012, Briscoe et al 2021). Such time series data are only available for limited taxonomic groups and regions.…”

Occupancy winners in tropical protected forests: a pantropical analysis

“…Additionally, occupancy models enable the estimation of detection probability and thus account for imperfect detection [ 10 ]. This is important because individuals can remain undetected while they are present, and variation in detectability across species and landscapes can lead to flawed inferences about occupancy [ 10 , 14 ]. Accounting for imperfect detection is useful in tropical forests, where many species are rare or elusive [ 15 ].…”