2021
DOI: 10.1057/s41311-021-00320-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can drones coerce? The effects of remote aerial coercion in counterterrorism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 74 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noting the limitations of Remote Warfare, Grieco and Hutto consider the effectiveness of drones-weapons that are integral to the fulfilment Remote Warfare-as instruments of coercion. Together they argue that remote control drones are fundamentally different from traditional airpower, "owing to changes in persistence, lethality, and relative risk" and that critically "these technological characteristics produce weaker coercive effects than often assumed" (Grieco & Hutto 2021) Put simply, Grieco and Hutto (2021) help us to consider the practical limitations of Remote Warfare when deployed in an attempt to effectively counter and coerce terrorist organisations. Indeed, it is with these technological drawbacks in mind that we turn to the work of Ash Rossiter.…”
Section: Rethinking Remote Warfarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noting the limitations of Remote Warfare, Grieco and Hutto consider the effectiveness of drones-weapons that are integral to the fulfilment Remote Warfare-as instruments of coercion. Together they argue that remote control drones are fundamentally different from traditional airpower, "owing to changes in persistence, lethality, and relative risk" and that critically "these technological characteristics produce weaker coercive effects than often assumed" (Grieco & Hutto 2021) Put simply, Grieco and Hutto (2021) help us to consider the practical limitations of Remote Warfare when deployed in an attempt to effectively counter and coerce terrorist organisations. Indeed, it is with these technological drawbacks in mind that we turn to the work of Ash Rossiter.…”
Section: Rethinking Remote Warfarementioning
confidence: 99%