2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can dimensional reduction technology make better use of the information of uncertainty indices when predicting volatility of Chinese crude oil futures?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 2022 ) and Yan et al. ( 2022 ). The forecast combinations employed all the predictive information from each predictor (Set U ) and combined them to obtain the final prediction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…( 2022 ) and Yan et al. ( 2022 ). The forecast combinations employed all the predictive information from each predictor (Set U ) and combined them to obtain the final prediction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…( 2022 ) and Yan et al. ( 2022 ) confirmed that the s-PCA-based PU index exhibits more powerful predictability on crude oil volatility compared with other competing methods. Moreover, s-PCA is also employed to extract predictive information from macro variables (Huang et al.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The MIDAS-RV-PLS model can be defined as: where denotes the key information/common factors (here, we use the first principal component of all predictors) extracted from all additional predictors by PLS. For details about the PCA and PLS technique, see Yan et al ( 2022 ) and He et al ( 2021b ). The parameters of MIDAS-RV-X, MIDAS-RV-PCA and MIDAS-RV-PLS models are still estimated by the maximum likelihood estimation method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%