2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2014.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can diffusion weighted image and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) differentiate benign from malignant cervical adenopathy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cut off value of 1.15 ×10 -3 mm 2 /s of ADC could differentiate benign from malignant lymph nodes. [30] Our findings also correlate with study conducted by All these studies demonstrate that diffusion weighted imaging with ADC threshold value can differentiate the benign and malignant lymph nodes [3,4,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] . However our findings did not correlate with study conducted by Hun Kung Lim et al in which they concluded that mean ADC does not allow differentiating benign from metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer and non-necrotic, small lymph nodes [46] .…”
Section: Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Adc Mapssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The cut off value of 1.15 ×10 -3 mm 2 /s of ADC could differentiate benign from malignant lymph nodes. [30] Our findings also correlate with study conducted by All these studies demonstrate that diffusion weighted imaging with ADC threshold value can differentiate the benign and malignant lymph nodes [3,4,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] . However our findings did not correlate with study conducted by Hun Kung Lim et al in which they concluded that mean ADC does not allow differentiating benign from metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer and non-necrotic, small lymph nodes [46] .…”
Section: Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Adc Mapssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Using an ADC value of 0.8, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy for differentiating between benign and malignant LNs were 76.4%, 85.7%, 86.6%, 75%, and 80.6%, respectively. Also, Ragheb and colleagues [22] stated that optimal ADC cutoff value for differentiating benign and malignant LNs was 0.61 with accuracy 96.7%, sensitivity 100%, specificity 88.9%, PPV 95.4% and NPV 100%. Again, Holzapfel and colleagues [23] reported an accuracy of 94% in characterizing metastatic LNs when using threshold of 1.02.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%