2017
DOI: 10.1142/s1230161217500019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Decay Be Ascribed to Classical Noise?

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By averaging over the stochastic process, one obtains the unconditional dephasing dynamics, while a continuous observation in time of the classical stochastic process allows to obtain the conditional states. It is in fact well known that Markovian dephasing is equivalent to the average dynamics obtained by putting a stochastic term in the system Hamiltonian [65][66][67][68][69]. Remarkably, we have derived the same results starting from a fully quantum approach, that is, considering the interaction of the system with a quantum environment, represented by trains of incoming bosonic input modes, with the classical stochastic terms appearing because of the measurement performed on the environment.…”
Section: Photo-detectionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…By averaging over the stochastic process, one obtains the unconditional dephasing dynamics, while a continuous observation in time of the classical stochastic process allows to obtain the conditional states. It is in fact well known that Markovian dephasing is equivalent to the average dynamics obtained by putting a stochastic term in the system Hamiltonian [65][66][67][68][69]. Remarkably, we have derived the same results starting from a fully quantum approach, that is, considering the interaction of the system with a quantum environment, represented by trains of incoming bosonic input modes, with the classical stochastic terms appearing because of the measurement performed on the environment.…”
Section: Photo-detectionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Roughly, the reason why decoupling works is that the clock state does not change the dynamics, and that the singularity at t = 0 in (2) integrates to something continuous. This is suprising, because previous studies [24,9,15] seemed to indicate that dilations of amplitude damping might be particularly bity. 3) dilating the single-qubit amplitude damping model.…”
Section: Physical Summary and Single-qubit Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since [3] works in the framework of constant Hamiltonian whereas here H(t) is not constant, we would like to relate the two frameworks. Choose m ∈ N and a piece-wise constant (step function) approximation H m of H with m equal length steps on (0, t] such that (15)…”
Section: The Dilation and Dynamical Decouplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet another definition of dephasing has been put forward, more recently, by Burgarth et al [30]. For the case where the Lindbladian is pure, namely, if L = L (L,0) for a single L, the QMS is (maximally) dephasing if it admits a stable basis or, equivalently, if L is a normal operator.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Definitions Of Dephasingmentioning
confidence: 99%